This article was posted 03/10/2008 and is most likely outdated.

The Use of Concrete Enclosed Reinforcing Rods as Grounding Electrodes
 

 

Subject - The Use of Concrete Enclosed Reinforcing Rods as Grounding Electrodes

March 10, 2008
This newsletter was sent to 28509 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

Interesting and Important Documents

 

The Use of Concrete Enclosed Reinforcing Rods as Grounding Electrodes

 

imageThe findings of Ufer that concrete-encased metal objects were effective in providing improved grounding under adverse soil conditions suggests that the reinforcing framework of footings for the columns of structural steel building would provide effective grounding function and means.

 

This paper, written by E.J. Fagan and R.H. Lee explores the effectiveness of rebar structures as grounding electrodes.

 

Click here to read the entire paper.

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

 
Comments
  • I'm really confused about the subject of using rebar in concrete as the grounding electrode. I guess this is based on field experience. In the early 1970s I was part of a crew that went around the country servicing GM Dealership signs. The pole sings were very large, 245 sq.ft. & very tall, 35 - 50 feet. The bases, foundations, were concrete with large anchor bolts and large amounts of rebar. Many of the signs we serviced had circuits shorted to the cabinet which resulted in the entire structure being energized. Most branch circuits had no grounding conductor but instead relied on the metal conduit. Over time the grounding path was lost and even though the 12 to 20 yards of concrete were in the ground, this wasn't enough to open the short circuit overcurrent device. A little boy was killed when he came into contact with one of these signs in the early 1970s in Fort Meade Florida. This resulted in the "GM Grounding Program" where a ground rod was driven next to each pole sign in a misguided effort to correct the problem. The point is this: with hundreds of feet of rebar, 20 yards of concrete, 4 ' anchor bolts and the steel structure, these signs were insulated by the concrete not grounded by it.

    Larry Cox

Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter