This article was posted 03/20/2007 and is most likely outdated.

Myth No. 1 – Grounding and Ideal
 

 
Topic - Grounding and Bonding
Subject
- Myth No. 1 – Grounding and Ideal

March 20, 2007  

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

Myth No. 1 – Grounding and Ideal

 

This is the first installment of a new series we’re developing to uncover industry myths.

 

Pathway to ground: Pathway to Improve Safety and Power Quality

 

Image IDEAL Industries, T&M Division

http://www.idealindustries.com/pdf/tm/Pathway%20to%20ground.pdf

 

Mike Holt’s Comment: The following text by Ideal is typical in what we see written on the topic of Grounding in our industry with lots of false statements.

 

Ideal: When the topic of power grounds comes up, the focus tends to be on the earth ground system itself, whether a single ground rod, mat, or grid system. While a low effective resistance is very important, the ground conductor and the terminations on that conductor will often be overlooked. A fault current has to pass through every connection on a ground conductor before it can reach the earth to be safely carried away.

Mike Holt: Fault current is not trying to reach the earth, it’s trying to get to the source.

 

Ideal: Testing of the effective resistance of a ground is important, but a good testing program must include the ground conductors and it’s connections and splices. The electrical ground system ultimately includes the grounded device itself, and the entire pathway back to the earth ground.

 

Ideal: The impedance of the ground conductor can be seen as the pathway that a faulted current will have to take to reach the earth ground system.

Mike Holt: Fault current is not trying to get to the earth, it’s trying to get to the source.

 

Ideal: When insulation fails, a short circuit occurs. Protective devices like fuses or breakers open to stop the fault current, but before these devices can act, the ground conductor must carry the fault enough to become a lower pathway to ground could suffer the consequence.

Mike Holt: This makes no sense.

 

Ideal: This high resistance bond can be a source of power quality problems as well.

Mike Holt: Is it ground or bond?

 

Ideal: Modern digital electronics work at 5-volt levels or less, switching, communicating and controlling our automated industrial processes. Imagine the problems fault currents cause when they produce voltage on the ground side of solid-state circuits. This common problem can be resolved completely by providing low resistance pathways for fault current to follow to earth ground.

Mike Holt: Grounding (a connection to the earth) does not reduce voltage on metal parts from a ground fault.

 

Ideal: Another related power quality issue is stray voltage. Very commonly caused by connecting the ground and neutral conductor in a sub-panel, stray voltage can energize all exposed metal and building steel. Stray voltage in dairy farms causes cows to eventually stop giving milk, and in hospitals will cause many problems with high tech diagnostic equipment, and patient connected equipment.

Mike Holt: I’m not sure what this has to do with the article on Grounding, because grounding does not reduce Stray Voltage.

 

Ideal: In our modern electrical environment, non-linear loads cause high neutral currents. The neutral conductor can carry substantial current back to the earth ground system.

Mike Holt: The grounding conductor (conductor to the earth) plays no role in nonlinear loads, and neutral current is not trying to get to the earth.

 

Ideal: The ground conductor is not considered an electrical conductor, and is present to provide a low resistance pathway for fault current.

Mike Holt: Grounding to the earth is not intended to provide a low resistive path for fault current.

 

Ideal: The neutral must be carried back to the service entrance, and can only be bonded to the ground conductor at the main neutral buss, where a large copper conductor carries all the return and faulted current back to the earth.

Mike Holt: Ground fault current is not attempting to return to the earth.

 

Ideal: Sometimes through error or ignorance, the neutral and ground are connected upstream from the service entrance. This is called a false, or bootleg ground. If the neutral and ground are connected anywhere else in the building, all grounded metal becomes part of the neutral conductor, constantly energized and creating various voltage potentials on electronic equipment. This causes many nuisance problems with automated equipment and computers, but can also create a hazardous and expensive electrical environment.

Mike Holt: I don’t understand the comment about expensive electrical environment.

 

Ideal: The solution to these problems is to include complete ground pathway testing as part of the standard procedure in your facility, and to choose test equipment which will help you locate and identify high resistance ground paths, and locate and eliminate bootleg grounds.

 

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

 
Comments
  • I currently work for a distributor of low voltage equipment for fire and security equipment etc. We have access to documentation of products from over 400 vendors if I remember correctly. Nearly every piece of documentation I see that is a “cut sheet” or sales flyer is either missing pertinent information or has errors in the information. Generally the “installation sheet” is more accurate, but not always.

    In my opinion, the marketing people don’t know enough about the product to describe it properly or catch their own mistakes. I think some of the technical people either don’t have time to look over the marketing people’s work, or don’t read English well enough to proof read the work.

    Dale H

Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter