This article was posted 10/05/2005 and is most likely outdated.

Grounding versus Bonding, Part 12: Communications Systems
 

 
Topic - Grounding and Bonding
Subject - Grounding versus Bonding, Part 12: Communications Systems

October 5, 2005 

| Ask a Question |  Code Graphic Code Quiz Free Stuff Instructors | Feedback
Online Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
  Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

Grounding versus Bonding, Part 12: Communications Systems

By Mike Holt for EC&M Magazine

How do you make communications systems safe?

So, it’s late Friday afternoon and you’re looking forward to the weekend. After working hard all week, you are thinking about what you’ll be doing in—you check your watch—one hour. Suddenly, the ringing of your cell phone jars you out of your thoughts.
After a brief conversation, you know you can forget about your weekend plans. Smoke pouring out of the server room is not a good sign. Worse, the news that Frank is on his way to the hospital after simply touching a communication cable has your stomach in knots.
This doesn’t sound like a good situation, does it? Unfortunately, many facilities—office, home, and residential—contain NEC Chapter 8 violations that could result in exactly this scenario. Or worse.

NEC Chapter 8

Some years ago, Sprint changed their installation requirements to mandate bonding their ground rod to the main bonding jumper (Randy Schmisny, former Chair of the IEEE Kansas City Section, helped bring this change about). Sprint’s previous stance was that their ground rod should be “separate from” the power ground rod—and this was costing them money.
Their new policy made their installations comply with Article 250 and Chapter 8. The impetus wasn’t pressure to comply with the NEC to was the need to prevent equipment failures and reduce service calls. Bonding their electrode to the rest of the system provided cost-savings through increased reliability, performance, and safety. Comply with NEC Chapter 8, and you can enjoy those same benefits.
NEC Chapter 8 contains the requirements for communications circuits (Article 800), Radio and Television Equipment (Article 810), Community Antenna Television (CATV) and Radio Distribution Systems (Article 820), and Network-Powered Broadband (Article 830).
Articles 800, 820, and 830 are about the same size. They have the same layout and other similarities. But Article 810 is less than half the size of these others and has its own structure. From a grounding and bonding standpoint, these Articles have the same goals—the primary one being to eliminate differences in potential. The grounding and bonding rules in these Articles often differ in the details. For example, you’ll find differences in the minimum conductor size and whether you need an insulated grounding conductor.

Where we get twisted

The telco typically provides the twisted-pair cable to a terminal board at the structure (Figure 800-1). This terminal board is the Network Interface Device (NID). Article 800 addresses twisted-pair wiring from the NID to the premises (Figure 800-2). We find this kind of wiring in such central station systems as fire and burglar alarm, telephone, and telegraph.
A primary protector is a device that protects installers and occupants from electric shock. You need a listed primary protector for each incoming communications circuit [800.90(A)]. The point of entrance is where the cable enters the structure or grounded raceway. Install the primary protector as close as practicable to the point of entrance [800.90(B)]. This practice reduces differences in potential between communications circuits and other metallic systems and objects. Those differences create personnel hazards and can lead to catastrophic failures—especially when lightning is present.
If you’re installing phone cable, ground the metallic sheath (or interrupt it by an insulating joint) as close as practicable to the point of entrance [800.100] (Figure 800-13). This rule applies to other types of cable covered by Articles 810, 820, and 830.
Four other rules apply universally, as well:

  • Keep grounding wires as short as practicable, and run them in a straight line. Why does this matter? Lightning tends to not to travel through sharp bends, corners, and loops. Instead, it tends to jump across them or flash over to something nearby.
  • As common sense suggests, you must protect the grounding conductor from physical damage—and that typically means you run it in a raceway. If you use a metal raceway, bond each end of the raceway to the grounding conductor.
  • Ground cables and metallic raceways as close as practicable to the entrance point.
  • Use only grounding conductors, connectors, and fittings listed as suitable for the purpose.

Grounding conductor

Article 800 requirements for grounding the phone cable and the primary protector are nearly identical to those of the other Chapter 8 Articles. The grounding conductor [800.100(A)] must be:

  • Insulated and listed as suitable for the purpose (Article 810 does not require insulation).
  • Copper or other corrosion-resistant conductive material (Article 810 has more stringent requirements).
  • Not smaller than 14 AWG (this differs in the other Articles).
  • As short as practicable. In 100(A), Articles 800, 820, and 830 contain a length limit of 20 ft  for dwelling units (Figure 800-14). Article 810 does not contain a length limit.

Sometimes, it isn’t practicable to limit the grounding conductor to 20 ft. Note the exception in 100(A)(4) of the appropriate Article. The details differ slightly, but essentially you can drive a separate ground rod that you must bond back to the grounding conductor.
Though the details differ among the Articles, the requirement to bond all external (entering a structure) systems (e.g., communications and power) to a single point remains. This practice minimizes the possibility of equipment damage—and electric shock—due to differences of potential between the systems (Figure 800-15). If you don’t make this bond, your system will be at risk for flashover, ground loops, power quality problems, and circulating currents. This is why someone can die from shock by merely touching the shield of the network cable on the back of a printer—even though all systems are properly “grounded.” Maybe size doesn’t matter, but bonding does.

Communications electrodes

If the structure has a grounding means, you have several grounding conductor termination options (Figure 800-16). First, select from the most preferable. Then, terminate to the nearest accessible one. In order of preference, these are:

  • Grounding electrode system [250.50].
  • Interior metal water piping system, within 5 ft from point of entrance [250.52(A)(1)].
  • Service bonding means [250.94].
  • Metallic service raceway.
  • Service equipment enclosure, or
  • Grounding electrode conductor (or GEC metal enclosure).

If the structure lacks a grounding means, install a ground rod not less than 5 ft long and 1⁄2 in. in diameter [800.100(B)(2)(2), 830.100(B)(2)(2)]. For 810 and 820 installations, use a 10 ft rod per 250.52, or bond to the grounded structure. Bond this to the grounding electrode system with a minimum 6 AWG conductor (Figure 800-19).

Article 810

This article differs markedly from the other Chapter 8 Articles. But it still requires you to reduce differences in potential. The difference is in the details of how you do that.
For example, you must provide a listed antenna discharge unit for each lead-in conductor from an outdoor antenna [810.20]. It doesn’t matter if you locate the discharge unit inside or outside, but you must locate it nearest the point of entrance—and away from combustible material. If the antenna is indoors (e.g., in an attic), you can skip the discharge unit.
Ground the antenna mast and discharge unit per 810.21 (A) through (K) (Figure 810-8). This grounding helps prevent voltage surges caused by static discharge or nearby lightning strikes from reaching the center conductor of the lead-in coaxial cable.
Satellite dishes provide additional challenges. Because the dish sits outdoors, wind creates a static charge on the antenna and attached cable. This charge can build up until it jumps across an air space—often passing through the electronics inside the low noise block down converter feed horn (LNBF) or receiver.
Manufacturers often mold copper-clad steel or bronze wire (17 AWG) into the jacket of the coaxial cable to eliminate the need for a separate ground wire—which simplifies grounding the satellite dish [810.21(F)(1)].

Avoiding confusion
To avoid Chapter 8 confusion, remember:

  • Grounding and bonding requirements are in the same place in each Article (except for Article 810, which has its own structure).
  • Make your grounding run short and straight.
  • Focus on eliminating differences in potential.
  • Use the Article for your specific installation.

Any time you work on a communications system, turn to Chapter 8. Bond to equalize potential, but ground to protect from lightning.

[ View More Newsletters ] [ Please Reply With Your Comments ]
2 0 0 5   G r o u n d i n g   v e r s u s   B o n d i n g   S e m i n a r s
 TOPIC  LOCATION  SPONSOR  INFORMATION
October 11st thru
October 12nd
Mike Holt, EC&M & Leviton: Grounding versus Bonding
Boston, MA
Boston Convention & Exhibition Center
415 Summer Street
(617) 954-2000
Mike Holt Enterprises, EC&M Magazine & Leviton
Email Donna Brown
Phone: (866) 632-2633
[ Download Brochure ]
[ Preview Video ] Download Quicktime Player [FREE]
[ Register Both Days ]
October 17th thru
October 18th
Mike Holt, EC&M & Leviton: Grounding versus Bonding
Philadelphia, PA
Pennsylvania Convention Center
1101 Arch St.
(215) 418-4700
Mike Holt Enterprises, EC&M magazine & Leviton
Email Donna Brown
Phone: (866) 632-2633
[ Download Brochure ]
[ Preview Video ] Download Quicktime Player [FREE]
[ Register Both Days ]
November 9th thru
November 10th
Mike Holt, EC&M & Leviton: Grounding versus Bonding
Seattle, WA
Meydenbauer Center
11100 NE 6th Street
(425) 637-1020
Mike Holt Enterprises, EC&M magazine & Leviton
Email Donna Brown
Phone: (866) 632-2633
[ Download Brochure ]
[ Preview Video ] Download Quicktime Player [FREE]
[ Register Both Days ]
November 16th thru
November 17th
Mike Holt, EC&M & Leviton: Grounding versus Bonding
Chicago, IL
Midwest Conference Center
401 W Lake St
Northlake, IL
(708) 409-2828
Outside Chicago - 7 Miles from Ohare
Mike Holt Enterprises, EC&M magazine & Leviton
Email Donna Brown
Phone: (866) 632-2633
[ Download Brochure ]
[ Preview Video ] Download Quicktime Player [FREE]
[ Register Both Days ]
[ Please Reply With Your Comments ] [ View More Newsletters ]

F o r w a r d   t h i s   N e w s l e t t e r   t o   a   F r i e n d !
Do you have a friend, relative, or colleague who you think would be interested in receiving this free newsletter? If so, we encourage you to forward this message along to them. If you received this email from someone else, and wish to receive your own free issues of our newsletter, sign up today!

C o n t a c t    I n f o r m a t i o n
   
 

Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Comments
  • thankyou for all your insight into the grouding and bonding problems that we run into. It is a very hard subject to teach and make our app. understand. Thankyou again for your help.

    louis petrone

Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter