This article was posted 07/14/2006 and is most likely outdated.

Grounding vs Bonding: 250.122 Sizing Equipment Grounding (Bonding) Conductor
 

 
Subject - Grounding vs Bonding: 250.122 Sizing Equipment Grounding (Bonding) Conductor

July 14, 2006  

| Ask a Question |  Code Graphic Code Quiz - All New! |  Free Stuff Instructors | Feedback
Online Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
[ image1 Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    
PART VI.   Hi Res - Cable/DSL [2990Kb]
VIEWING Video FILE requires
Real Media Player [ FREE ]

Sections

250.122 Sizing Equipment Grounding (Bonding) Conductor.

(A) General. The equipment grounding (bonding) conductor must be sized in accordance with Table 250.122, based on the ampere rating of the circuit-protection device, but in no case is it required to be larger than the circuit conductors. Figure 250–169

Author’s Comment: Equipment grounding (bonding) conductors must be capable of safely conducting any ground-fault current likely to be imposed on them [110.10]. If the equipment grounding (bonding) conductor isn’t sized to withstand the ground-fault current, the conductor may burn clear before the protective device responds.

Table 250.122—Minimum Size Equipment Grounding (Bonding) Conductor

Protection Rating.......CopperConductor
15A..........................14 AWG
20A...........................12 AWG
30—60A..................10 AWG
70—100A..................8 AWG
110—200A................6 AWG
225—300A................4 AWG
350—400A................3 AWG
450—500A................2 AWG
600A...........................1 AWG
700—800A.............1/0 AWG
1,000A.....................2/0 AWG
1,200A.....................3/0 AWG

imageSend to a Friend


Figure 250–169
(Click on image to enlarge)

       
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

F o r w a r d   t h i s   N e w s l e t t e r   t o   a   F r i e n d !
Do you have a friend, relative, or colleague who you think would be interested in receiving this free newsletter? If so, we encourage you to forward this message along to them. If you received this email from someone else, and wish to receive your own free issues of our newsletter, sign up today!

C o n t a c t    I n f o r m a t i o n
 

Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Comments
  • 240.4(B) is one of the LIES in National Electrical Code. Almost every if not all manufaturers of thermal magnetic circuits breakers state that using a conductor that is less than the rating of the circuit breaker will result in the breaker tripping at a lower current level than it should. As someone who has extensive industrial electrical experience I have to know what Code rules are a bit of a lie. A lot of Code rules are based on acceptance of a life of 10 or 15 years in heavy service. This is not good for production if you have to require once every 10 years.

    When reparing a 100 amp electrical service I insist on using #2 copper or #0 aluminum. A 100 amp service is either very lightly loaded or very heavily taxed and very rarely in between.

    Remind your customers than when they heat up a wire that is "Code" size what they are doing is paying for electricity and not getting it. More electricity will reach the load if the wire is bigger than Code. Circuits will always live longer if the wire size is a bit bigger. In a corrosive location you also need extra wire size so that the conductor can be 1/3 eaten before replacement is required. Some corrosive such as ammonia gas are very hard on copper wire and even if you RTV ( silicone sealant ) the heck out of box lugs there still might be a way for corrosive gases to get inside of the cable.

    Another LIE in NEC is that the cord for an underwater swimming pool light has to be long enough to permit replamping without draining a pool. If you have ever fixed a boat dock in 3 to 5 feet of water you find out very quickly that buoyancy keeps you from turning a wrench or a screwdriver. A pool is what NASA uses for zero gravity training. The problem is that when changing an underwater light you need both scuba gear and enough weights to be a poor excuse for the Titanic. There are only so many times that a homeowner can spend $500 on changing a light bulb before going out and buying a fiberoptic refit kit.

    Pentair still makes 120 volt and 12 volt underwater incandescent light fixtures so that that can sell to cheapskates who cannot resist an alleged bargain. I am still trying to figure out who makes fiberoptic refit kits but I am sure that someone makes them.

    Mike Cole mc5w at earthlink dot net

    Michael R. Cole

Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter