This article was posted 06/27/2013 and is most likely outdated.

Mike Holt - Rating of the Electrical Industry - 2013
header
Mike Holt's State Rating of the Electrical Industry - 2013

Mike Holt’s State Rating of the Electrical Industry - 2013
Image 1-map

As part of our ongoing commitment to safety in the electrical community, we annually update our report that rates and assigns a safety grade to each of the U.S. states.

The standard for measurement in these findings and the ‘points’ assigned are based on adoption of the most current Code on a state-wide level, requirement for licensing for Apprentices, Journeymen, Master Electricians, Inspectors and Professional Engineers, as well as the requirement for continuing education for license renewal at the state level for all of these classifications.

Important note: We know that there are many safe counties and municipalities that take licensing and enforcement seriously.  This is not necessarily reflected in the data reported here because this analysis is based on a uniform standard, which is the State’s adoption of the requirements - and not local.

Congratulations to the following States for their A+ rating. These states have set the standard for electrical safety:

  • Alaska
  • Arkansas
  • Iowa
  • Maine
  • Minnesota
  • North Dakota
  • Oklahoma
  • Oregon
  • South Dakota
  • Utah
  • Wyoming

 

We'd also like to acknowledge the following states for the most improvement on their rankings since our last report:
  • Wisconsin (+5)
  • Alabama (+3)
  • Alaska, Arkansas, Hawaii, Utah (+2)

Below is a summary of the findings.

We appreciate your feedback! If you have any updated information that you feel would change our rankings on this year’s report, please post your comment – we appreciate your feedback to help keep this analysis accurate and current.

To see details of the numbers behind these grades Click Here.

STATE

2007

2009

2010 2012 2013

 CHANGE

  REASON FOR CHANGE

ALABAMA

B- C- C- C- B-

+3

 State-wide licensing; 2011 NEC

ALASKA

B B+ A- A- A+

+2

 2011 NEC; INSP req. CE

ARIZONA

D D D D D

0

 

ARKANSAS

A- A- A- A- A+

+2

 2011 NEC; INSP req. CE

CALIFORNIA

A- A- A- A- A-

0

 

COLORADO

C+ B- B- B B+

+1

 CC program

CONNECTICUT

A- A- A- B+ B+

0

 

D.C.

C C C C C

0

 

DELAWARE

A- B+ A- A- A

+1

 2011 NEC

FLORIDA

B+ B B+ B B

0

 

GEORGIA

B B- B- C+ B-

+1

 2011 NEC

HAWAII

B- C C C B-

+2

 2008 NEC

IDAHO

B+ B+ A- A- A-

0

 

ILLINOIS

D D D D+ D+

0

 

INDIANA

C- C- C- C- C-

0

 

IOWA

D A- A A A+

+1

 2011 NEC

KANSAS

C- D D D D

0

 

KENTUCKY

A- A- A A- A

+1

 2011 NEC

LOUISIANA

C C+ B- C+ B-

+1

 2011 NEC

MAINE

A A A A A+

+1

 Apprentice lic.

MARYLAND

D D D D+ C-

+1

 CPC req. for Engineers

MASSACHUSETTS

A- A+ A A A

0

 

MIGHIGAN

A- A- A A- A-

0

 

MINNESOTA

A+ A+ A+ A+ A+

0

 

MISSISSIPPI

D+ D+ D+ D+ D+

0

 

MISSOURI

D+ D D D D

0

 

MONTANA

B B B+ A- A

+1

 2011 NEC

NEBRASKA

B+ B A- A A

0

 

NEVADA

D+ D+ D+ D+ D+

0

 

NEW HAMPSHIRE

A- A- A- A- A-

0

 

NEW JERSEY

B+ A- A- A- A

+1

 2011 NEC

NEW MEXICO

B+ B+ B+ B+ A-

0

 2011 NEC

NEW YORK

D+ D+ D+ C- C-

0

 

NORTH CAROLINA

A A B+ B B+

+1

 2011 NEC

NORTH DAKOTA

A+ A+ A+ A+ A+

0

 

OHIO

A- B+ B+ B B+

+1

 2011 NEC

OKLAHOMA

A+ A+ A+ A A+

1

 2011 NEC

OREGON

A+ A+ A+ A+ A+

0

 

PENNSYLVANIA

C C- C+ C C+

+1

 INSP req. CE

RHODE ISLAND

A A A A A

0

 

SOUTH CAROLINA

B- B- B B- B-

0

 

SOUTH DAKOTA

A A+ A+ A+ A+

0

 

TENNESSEE

B B B B- B

+1

 LLE license

TEXAS

B+ A- A- A- A-

0

 

UTAH

A A A A- A+

+2

 2011 NEC; Apprentice lic.

VERMONT

B B+ A- A A

0

 

VIRGINIA

B+ A- A- A- A-

0

 

WASHINGTON

A- A A A- A-

0

 

WEST VIRGINIA

B B B+ B B

0

 

WISCONSIN

C+ C+ C+ C A-

+5

 State lic., CE req., CPC for Engineers

WYOMING

A A+ A+ A+ A+

0

 
             

 

NEC adoption: The number of points assigned for adoption of the most current NEC is 3. This year 2011NEC=3 points, 2008NEC=2 points, 2005NEC=1 point, and prior NEC or local adoption = 0 points.

2013 Data
2012 Data
2010 Data
2009 Data
2007 Data

 
We acknowledge and congratulate all those states that continue to set high standards in electrical safety.
footer
This newsletter was sent to 32524 Subscribers
Unsubscribe
Comments
  • I apologize if this question has already been asked. Has anyone ever taken this safety ratings data and compared the trends to actual electrically related incidents (electrocution, "bad wiring" electrical fires, electrical worker injuries, etc.). I realize there are two significant issues - local codes and population/urban density - however I would be interested into the actual research.

    LDM  June 27 2013, 10:49 pm EDT

Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter