This article was posted 08/31/2011 and is most likely outdated.

Mike Holt Newsletters
 

 

Topic - Alternative Energy
Subject - Budget cuts trigger early end to solar energy credits

August 31, 2011
This newsletter was sent to 17654 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Continuing EducationQuizzes |  Free Stuff Instructors Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]  

Budget cuts trigger early end to solar energy credits

California homeowner Jim Adams, right, installed solar panels on his roof -- saving $10,000 thanks to tax incentives.

California homeowner Jim Adams installed solar panels on his roof -- saving $10,000 thanks to tax incentives.

By Jim Roope, CNN Radio

August 30, 2011 10:46 a.m. EDT

 

Los Angeles (CNN) -- If you've ever thought, "One day, I'm going to put in a solar energy system," today might be the day.

Economic issues across the nation are contributing to the early demise of solar incentives such as tax breaks, grants and rebates.

"We've been thinking about this for several years," said California homeowner Jim Adams.

"The cost wasn't really coming down, so we went to the bank, asked for a loan and decided to get it done."

So Adams had a 16-panel system installed on his roof in La Crescenta, California, about 15 miles north of Los Angeles.

He received a 30% tax credit from the federal government and a 10% cash rebate from the state.

It cost him $16,000 -- a savings of $10,000.

This year, a federal 30% cash rebate through the U.S. Treasury Department comes to an end. And the 30% federal tax credit program will conclude at the end of 2016.

These incentives, created as part of the federal stimulus package a few years ago, were designed to create a vibrant solar energy market. Along with the federal program, 29 states offered incentives. Many of those state programs are also becoming victims of budget cuts.

In Florida, Michael Hoffman, a taxation professor, hoped that between the federal tax credit and the state rebate, he'd be able to better afford a solar energy system.

But a computer error in the state's application process actually cost him $20,000 more than he had planned on paying.

Hoffman blamed "poor record-keeping" on the state's end.

"They took more applications than they had money for," he said.

"If we'd known that our cost was going to be $33,000 instead of $13,000, that would have been a fairly hard one to sell to ourselves just for the ecological, environmental warm and fuzzies."

Sales of rooftop solar panel installations jumped 67% last year, compared with 2009, according to the Solar Energies Industry Association.

Now, those sales are starting to drop because of state budget cuts and administrative problems like Hoffman's experience in Florida.

The solar industry is lobbying the federal government to continue the 30% cash rebate program that's ending this year.

But there's not much hope for an extension, considering the current political climate in Washington, where lawmakers are focused on trimming the budget.

Still, there are signs that Americans will continue to invest in solar energy systems for their homes over the next few years, helping to bring down the costs of solar panels in some areas.

 

 

Click here to post a comment

[ Post Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]
[ View More Newsletters ]

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

 

 
Comments
  • Right on the money, Mike. And if we look at emission discharges, they happen at the power plant, instead of from each vehicle exhaust. It is even more complex, but in simplistic form, power plants can convert fossile fuel to electric energy at about 85% efficicicency. Multiply that times about .98 to get it out of the plant and times about .97 to get it to the user, then times about 90% to convert it to vehicle motion, and you have about 72% efficiency hitting the road. An automotive engine can beat that substantially. My estimates are quick and dirty, but a bit on the high side. Fact is that everytime energy is converted from one form to another, efficiency suffers. The cumulative product is the end result. This is but one of the reasons why electricity will cost consumers about 5 to 9 times as much as petroleum based fuels. People tend to think of battery power as being free. It is just not so. The recharging costs money. It would take a thousand pages to present the whole story, because we need to look at the capital and expense portions from cradle to grave for all of the processes in harvesting through utilizing the energy. But it is not free and the environmental footprint is complex also.

    My basic premise is that the dollars tend to sort out the success stories. And when government is involved, it is not only a distorted economic situation, but also very inefficient due to the oversight. It always builds bigger government, higher taxes on those who support the government, and higher taxes to support the businesses and conumers who prosper due to the fuzzy math.

    This is way too complex to cover in a thread as simplistic as this one.

      September 2 2011, 9:39 pm EDT
  • Reply from: Mike Holt   September 3 2011, 7:25 am EDT
    I understand exactly what you are saying, it's called critical thinking and few have the desire to think this way. I think all of this 'energy saving' stuff is a scam...

    Reply from: Bob H   October 12 2011, 6:37 pm EDT
    I may be misunderstanding your point but I believe that the efficiency of gasoline engines in converting fossil fuel to output power is around 30% at best, maybe up to 40% for diesel engines.


Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter