Mike Holt, although I respect your knowledge on electrical code and am a master electrician because of your help. I also currently own a struggling electrical contracting business with 20 of 22 employees laid off and for my 2 cents, I 100% agree with Washington States reasoning for delaying this.
With the current situation in the construction industry, any additional cost at this time being forced upon and owner about to decide to build could be a deciding factor on us having a job to do or not. Thus in turn hiring employees and needing your products again.
Lower property values in addition to increasing material cost has caused housing and commercial property already to not appraise for the total amount needed to build a building. Owners trying to finance with the standard 20% down to build a building have to add this cost out of their pocket in cash. Adding cost to a job FOR ANY REASON at this time likely can be a breaking point for a job, because the owner must cash fund any difference from the cost to build and the appraisal.
Simple example old days:
$100,000.00 Cost to build and appraisal
-$20,000.00 20% down = owners out of pocket
$80,000.00 Amount needed to finance
Example currently:
$100,000.00 Cost to build
$80,000 Actual appraisal
$16,000 20% down payment
$36,000 Amount down + difference of cost and appraisal = owners out of pocket
$????? Insert here any additional cost caused by red tape or code changes
So as you can see above, numbers matter. A little delay to help us all get through this I see as an informed decision by the lawmaker in my opinion.
FYI: I also take issue with manufactures having items written in the code that is not even on the market yet, like ARC Fault receptacles were this code cycle. This creates a market before the product is brought to shelves.
A conservative Libertarian electrician
Mike in AL February 9 2011, 10:16 am EST
|