While we all hope to to eliminate the chances of any injuries to children, I suggest that the electrical industry has had an outstanding record. While much has been made of the incidence of child injury due to electrical outlets, according to the CPSC, the annual rate of child electrical injury is 2400, of which 15% are due to placing foreign objects into outlets, or about 360 kids per year. Most of injuries are caused by faulty appliances or cords. By comparison, 155,400 children were treated for toy-related injuries, which results in as many as 11 fatalities annually.
To combat this "epidemic" problem, we have instituted code changes effecting installations in every home. While I don't mean to sound sarcastic, it occurs to me that the best safety device has always been parental vigilance and teaching; despite having watched me do electrical work around the house, none of my four kids has ever been hurt by an electrical mishap, which I suspect has more to do with stern warnings and watching than tamper-resistant outlets, which were unavailable until recently. Yet, I still wonder what warning a parent might give to give a three-year old regarding a toy; whether parents should be be armed with chemical test kits to find those coated with lead or containing toxic compounds which surprisingly find occasional entry into the toys we buy. Maybe we could limit kids to something safe - like paper and crayons or sidewalk chalk (whoops! found lead in those, too, didn't we?)
We will eventually reduce that figure of 360 as TR outlets become more prevalent, and perhaps the industry will invent devices to prevent the remaining 85% of child electrical injury. In our efforts to make the world completely benign to the curious explorations of children, though, some aspect of environment will go unrecognized. Another child will be hurt in some manner unanticipated; more rules and standards will be instituted. However, I would suggest that teaching and adult supervision is always the best, as the world is a dangerous place; a child able to recognize and avoid danger is much better off. Paul Lazorko
|