This article was posted 03/06/2009 and is most likely outdated.

Jury orders Ameren to pay $2.3 million to families of teens
 

 

Subject - Jury orders Ameren to pay $2.3 million to families of teens

March 6, 2009
This newsletter was sent to 22034 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

Jury orders Ameren to pay $2.3 million to families of teens

Mike,

Here is the newspaper article concerning the electric shock drownings. You will notice the comments at the bottom are heavily weighted in the favor of AmerenUE. That’s because the article merely states that the line under the lake was the cause. Nothing was said that it wasn’t the underground energized lines that were the problems but rather the non-existent concentric neutrals at two locations right at the lake. As I mentioned to you I will write up a summary of all of the tests that I made along with the irrefutable conclusions, hopefully in a week or so. I’ll send you a copy when completed. I appreciate your help in this. Sometimes I feel like Don Quixote fighting the windmills with a wooden sword, but at last we have managed to get the word out that these stray currents are dangerous.

Don Johnson

Mike Holt’s Comment: Don Johnson was the electrical engineer representing the families.

image

March 5, 2009 - Attorney Brooks Kenagy, center, hugs Tracy and Ginger Jones outside the Jefferson County Courthouse. The Joneses own the house on Spring Lake south of De Soto where four teenagers were injured three years ago. The jury found in favor of the three families involved in a lawsuit against Ameren UE. The teenagers jumped off Jones's dock into electrified water. (J.B. Forbes /P-D)

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
03/06/2009

HILLSBORO — Families of three teenagers involved in an electrical accident three years ago wept and embraced Thursday as they heard a Jefferson County jury recommend that AmerenUE pay them a combined $2.3 million.

On March 18, 2006, Nic Harbison, then 16, Morgan Milfeld and Tim Fitzpatrick, both then 15, and Joshua McClure, then 18, jumped into Spring Lake just south of De Soto. The teens had been sitting in a hot tub at a friend's home in the Summer Set subdivision, about 5 miles south of De Soto. Shortly after hitting the water, the teens became immoblized by an electric current.

Nic Harbison drowned, the others were resucitated.

Harbison's father, Jerry "Jay" Harbison, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Tracy and Ginger Jones, who owned the dock from which the kids jumped, and against AmerenUE. He dropped the suit against the Joneses in October.

Milfeld and Fitzpatrick also filed suits against Ameren for injuries they suffered.

The cases against the utility company were tried together over nine days. The jury deliberated for 1 ½ days and voted 9-3 in finding that Ameren's cable under the lake caused the current that paralyzed the swimmers.

The jury awarded $1.25 million to the Harbisons; $725,000 to Fitzpatrick and $350,000 to Milfeld. Fitzpatrick is now 18 and a senior at De Soto High School. Milfeld, 19, plays soccer for Webster University.

AmerenUE spokeswoman Susan Gallagher said the company does not plan to make any changes to the underground cable at the lake in light of the jury's decision.

"We do not believe our electrical facilities present any hazards," she said, adding that the company has not decided whether to appeal the ruling.

AmerenUE attorney James Virtel brought in experts and utility company employees who testified that the dock was the source of the stray voltage that immobilized the teens.

"We appreciate the jury's hard work and attention, but we're very disappointed in their decision," Virtel said. "We believe from the evidence and the science of electricity that our underground system did not cause the electricity in the water that immoblized these teenagers."

Lawyers Maurice Graham, Michael Williams and Brooks Kenagy represented the families.

"It was obviously a difficult decision for the jury as evidenced by requiring two days of deliberation," Graham said. "The Fitzpatrick, Milfeld and Harbison families are relieved to have this behind them."

As an expression of that relief, some family members gathered on the dock after the verdict and threw flowers into the water.

By Christine Byers

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/E2257DB6FC27C882862575710017D280?OpenDocument

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

 
Comments
  • Jim, I appreciate your comments on this. And I'm sure you're correct in your analysis. In this case the dock was very well grounded and when the electric utility first measured the 4.2 volts from the water to the dock frame the distance was approximately 2 ft. away from the aluminum dock ladder which was in the water according to the persons that made the measurement. I understand that they merely stuck their meter probe directly into the water and touched the other probe to the dock frame. Based upon these statements it appears that this measurement was within this 2 volt per foot gradient. Again remember that this voltage measurement was during the low load time of the day. When the utility put their recording meters on the dock, as I mentioned previously, the voltage level reached nearly 9 volts during the evening hours, again approximately 2 feet from the dock frame with the dock frame still well grounded. In each case the highest voltage readings were during the evening hours when the utility load currents would be at the highest. The teenagers as you will recall were swimming during the evening hours approximately 7:30 p.m. One thing I might mention is that in literally all of the readings, both recorded and instantaneous readings including the readings taken by me, the voltage and current readings were in a constant state of fluctuation. Based on my experience these constant fluctuations are typical of stray voltages usually caused by the electric utility. There was also considerable evidence described by the teenagers in the lake that when they first jumped in the water they felt nothing. However after several minutes of swimming around the dock they started feeling these surges. One boy described the currents as occurring in short pulses and then they went away and then they occurred again, constantly off and on. Maybe Jim you can tell me, when the dock wiring is a problem in your experience does it occur in pulses as these kids described and as I measured from a fixed ground rod in the lake? It would seem to me that if somehow the dock was energized, and if for some reason the circuit breaker protecting the dock did not trip, the current into the water would be more of a continuous flow instead of intermittent as was described in this case. What has been your experience? Don



Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter