This article was posted 03/06/2009 and is most likely outdated.

Jury orders Ameren to pay $2.3 million to families of teens
 

 

Subject - Jury orders Ameren to pay $2.3 million to families of teens

March 6, 2009
This newsletter was sent to 22034 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

Jury orders Ameren to pay $2.3 million to families of teens

Mike,

Here is the newspaper article concerning the electric shock drownings. You will notice the comments at the bottom are heavily weighted in the favor of AmerenUE. That’s because the article merely states that the line under the lake was the cause. Nothing was said that it wasn’t the underground energized lines that were the problems but rather the non-existent concentric neutrals at two locations right at the lake. As I mentioned to you I will write up a summary of all of the tests that I made along with the irrefutable conclusions, hopefully in a week or so. I’ll send you a copy when completed. I appreciate your help in this. Sometimes I feel like Don Quixote fighting the windmills with a wooden sword, but at last we have managed to get the word out that these stray currents are dangerous.

Don Johnson

Mike Holt’s Comment: Don Johnson was the electrical engineer representing the families.

image

March 5, 2009 - Attorney Brooks Kenagy, center, hugs Tracy and Ginger Jones outside the Jefferson County Courthouse. The Joneses own the house on Spring Lake south of De Soto where four teenagers were injured three years ago. The jury found in favor of the three families involved in a lawsuit against Ameren UE. The teenagers jumped off Jones's dock into electrified water. (J.B. Forbes /P-D)

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
03/06/2009

HILLSBORO — Families of three teenagers involved in an electrical accident three years ago wept and embraced Thursday as they heard a Jefferson County jury recommend that AmerenUE pay them a combined $2.3 million.

On March 18, 2006, Nic Harbison, then 16, Morgan Milfeld and Tim Fitzpatrick, both then 15, and Joshua McClure, then 18, jumped into Spring Lake just south of De Soto. The teens had been sitting in a hot tub at a friend's home in the Summer Set subdivision, about 5 miles south of De Soto. Shortly after hitting the water, the teens became immoblized by an electric current.

Nic Harbison drowned, the others were resucitated.

Harbison's father, Jerry "Jay" Harbison, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Tracy and Ginger Jones, who owned the dock from which the kids jumped, and against AmerenUE. He dropped the suit against the Joneses in October.

Milfeld and Fitzpatrick also filed suits against Ameren for injuries they suffered.

The cases against the utility company were tried together over nine days. The jury deliberated for 1 ½ days and voted 9-3 in finding that Ameren's cable under the lake caused the current that paralyzed the swimmers.

The jury awarded $1.25 million to the Harbisons; $725,000 to Fitzpatrick and $350,000 to Milfeld. Fitzpatrick is now 18 and a senior at De Soto High School. Milfeld, 19, plays soccer for Webster University.

AmerenUE spokeswoman Susan Gallagher said the company does not plan to make any changes to the underground cable at the lake in light of the jury's decision.

"We do not believe our electrical facilities present any hazards," she said, adding that the company has not decided whether to appeal the ruling.

AmerenUE attorney James Virtel brought in experts and utility company employees who testified that the dock was the source of the stray voltage that immobilized the teens.

"We appreciate the jury's hard work and attention, but we're very disappointed in their decision," Virtel said. "We believe from the evidence and the science of electricity that our underground system did not cause the electricity in the water that immoblized these teenagers."

Lawyers Maurice Graham, Michael Williams and Brooks Kenagy represented the families.

"It was obviously a difficult decision for the jury as evidenced by requiring two days of deliberation," Graham said. "The Fitzpatrick, Milfeld and Harbison families are relieved to have this behind them."

As an expression of that relief, some family members gathered on the dock after the verdict and threw flowers into the water.

By Christine Byers

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/E2257DB6FC27C882862575710017D280?OpenDocument

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

 
Comments
  • I KNOW this is not going to be a popular reply, but lawsuits like this are reflective of what's wrong with this country.

    No personal responsibility.

    There were signs posted stating no swimming.

    What difference does it make how the accident happened? If you take away the fact the kids made a choice to break the law, there would be no drowning.

    Yes, I also have made dumb choices in my youth, and still occasionally make dumb choices. But I am responsibile for those choices; I don't go around looking for deep pockets to sue for my choices.

    There is no difference in this case than in the one where the 2 kids climbed over the utility substation fence, started horsing around on the electrical equipment, and were killed. Parents sued the utility and won some money because the locked chain-link fence with posted "keep out high voltage" sings attached was not "secure" enough to keep the kids out.

    It is a tragedy; there is suffering; there is - and will continue to be - pain.

    But none of that relieves the responsibility of the kids involved for the choices they freely made.

    Choices have consequences. A wise person once said "There is a choice you make, in evertything you do, and the choice you make, makes you."

    Choices are life. There are no guarantees, and there is no one responsible for compensating you when you make a wrong choice. That is a hard lesson, but it is reality. It is life.

    Again, I know this will not be popular reply, and I fully expect to be attacked personally for being so cold and unfeeling. I am willing to accept that, as I believe it is a greater injustice to fail to pass on the natural laws to the generation who will inherit this country than it is to try to throw money at every bad choice others make in their lives in order to feel good.

    We owe it to our children to be responsible and self-reliant.

    My heart and prayers go out to those affected; hopefully they will learn from their mistakes. Unfortunately this court decision only reinforces the attitude that someone else is responsibile for our choices.

    Thanks for tolerating another point of view.....

    mike

Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter