This article was posted 03/05/2009 and is most likely outdated.

Smoke Detectors on AFCI Protected Circuit?
 

 

Topic - AFCI
Subject - Smoke Detectors on AFCI Protected Circuit?

March 5, 2009
This newsletter was sent to 22048 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

Smoke Detectors on AFCI Protected Circuit?

Let’s review the 2008 NEC

ImageDwelling Unit Circuits. All 15A or 20A, 120V branch circuits in dwelling units supplying outlets in family rooms, dining rooms, living rooms, parlors, libraries, dens, bedrooms, sunrooms, recreation rooms, closets, hallways, or similar rooms or areas must be protected by a listed AFCI device of the combination type [210.12(B)].

The 120V circuit limitation means AFCI protection isn’t required for equipment rated 230V, such as a baseboard heater or room air conditioner. For more information, visit www.MikeHolt.com, click on the “Search” link, and search for “AFCI.”

Smoke alarms connected to a 15A or 20A circuit of a dwelling unit must be AFCI protected if the smoke alarm is located in one of the areas specified In 210.12(B). The exemption from AFCI protection for the “fire alarm circuit” contained in 760.41(B) and 760.121(B) doesn’t apply to the single-or multiple-station smoke alarm circuit typically installed in dwelling unit bedroom areas. This is because a smoke alarm circuit isn’t a fire alarm circuit as defined in NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm Code. Unlike single-or multiple-station smoke alarms, fire alarm systems are managed by a fire alarm control panel.

Note: An arc-fault circuit interrupter is a device intended to de-energize the circuit when it detects the current waveform characteristics unique to an arcing fault [210.12(A)].

Mike Holt’s Comment: The National Fire Marshals Association supports the NEC requirement that circuits for smoke detectors be AFCI protected.

You might find the following news article from The Buffalo News (New York) http://www.buffalonews.com/437/story/596807.html to be of some interest.

A faulty smoke detector sparked a fire that caused $175,000 damage to a Clarence home at about 4:45 p.m. Tuesday, Amherst Fire Control said.

The fire at 8895 County Road started shortly before 4:45 p. m. and was noted by a volunteer firefighter passing the scene.

Clarence Center firefighters battled the blaze with crews from Clarence, Getzville and East Amherst. Clarence Center Chief David Case said the fire was caused by the smoke detector in the living room ceiling. The blaze caused extensive fire, heat and smoke damage throughout the 1-1/2-story wood frame house.

No one was home at the time of the blaze. The American Red Cross was assisting the family, which was displaced by the fire.

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

 
Comments
  • I think sometimes the error is too far on the side of safety......that is here is one case in which a smoke alarm supposedly caused a fire......the question that is not answered is were the other smoke alarms operating and sounding at this time??..........also if the AFCI was there and had tripped to the off position, would that be enough to stop this fire OR was it caused by an over heated component that had already charred the circuit board which was already at a combustible temperature had caught fire and then the arcing of the 120v. feed would have tripped the AFCI? (the most likely scenario).........From your support article it seems like there was a BIG jumping to a conclusion to get support for this recent code addition.........

    Another point......many wired in smoke detectors DO NOT have the battery backup mentioned in previous responses.......so if a general lighting circuit in a residential home was used as the power source for the smoke detectors and the AFCI tripped........where is the protection??...........as the fire may have already started (see the example later on).......

    Since now in the fire alarm industry, fire alarm cables have a red jacket to distinguish them from other cables..........let's have a red jacketed 14/2 cable to supply ALL the smoke detectors using 2 circuits minimum in the residence and this red jacked 14/2 be fed from a standard 15 amp breaker that also has a red color or marking and be secured in the on position, also the mounting boxes for smoke detectors be made from red plastic or be colored red to identify them and the circuitry they contain.........or require that all the smoke detectors be on several (minimum 4) circuits in the residence to prevent one AFCI from removing power from the smoke detectors when it trips.......

    I understand the logic behind the addition to the NFPA code for the AFCI breakers..........but let us not undo the good that has become established in a residential home with the addition of smoke detectors by having them non-functioning because of our zeliousness to provide the safest envirement possible to live in...........

    Remember we can not prevent all hazards by legislation.......There is a personal level of responsibility there too..........IE, placing an electric heater too close to a bed or couch will start a fire.......when a lamp cord finally arcs and trips the AFCI shutting down the heater.......The fire is started and the AFCI did not prevent it!!.........and that AFCI may have shut down the smoke detectors closest to the fire, removing the early detection that the smoke detectors are to give the people dwelling in the residence.........i agree with their use but lets not go crazy or we will have frivolous law suits similar to holding a hot cup of coffee between you legs and getting paid for burning your thighs because the hot coffee splashed on your legs while driving your car.........

    Lets work to keep smoke detectors operating...........I personally do not like AFCI breakers ahead of smoke detectors for the above reasons!!.........

    Ernie

Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter