This article was posted 08/17/2006 and is most likely outdated.

NASA Gets it Wrong!
 

 
Topic - Grounding and Bonding
Subject - NASA Gets it Wrong!

August 17, 2006  

| Ask a Question |  Code Graphic Code Quiz - All New! |  Free Stuff Instructors | Feedback
Online Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
[ image1 Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    
NASA Gets it Wrong!

 

 

Public Lessons Learned Entry: 0552

Lesson Info:

  • Lesson Number: 0552
  • Lesson Date: 1997-05-21
  • Submitting Organization: JSC
  • Submitted by: L. Underwood

Subject: Potential Electrical Shock Hazard Involving Light Poles on Streets and in Parking Lots

Description of Driving Event: Several randomly sampled exterior street and parking lot light poles were found to have defective electrical grounds that could result in a potentially lethal electric shock hazard if the pole is touched by a person.

The hazard is primarily a result of two conditions:

  1. The original design of the power distribution circuit lacked an equipment grounding conductor even though the installation met the National Electric Code at the time.
  2. The normal breakdown over time of the materials utilized in the supplemental ground rod which was installed to correct the original design deficiency.

The poles are energized primarily at night, but can be remotely energized for testing and repair during daylight hours. Certain power distribution system failure modes may result in an energized light pole. While it is unlikely to have a combination of a defective grounding condition and a power system fault, the condition can be lethal if the pole becomes energized. However, the shock hazard can be precluded by the installation of an upgraded supplemental ground to the earth.

Lesson(s) Learned:

Supplementary electrical grounding protection for streetlamp structures must be periodically verified.

Recommendation(s):

All personnel should understand the electrical shock hazard presented by an energized light pole. Therefore, do not touch street or parking lot light poles!

Immediate interim measures are being implemented, as follows:

  1. new ground rods are being installed on each light pole on-site,
  2. a temporary means of insulating the base of each pole is being examined
  3. a preliminary report has been requested that will make recommendations for permanent repair or replacement of the existing exterior lighting system.

Approval Info:

  • Approval Date: 1997-05-22
  • Approval Name: Ronald A. Montague
  • Approval Organization: NA3
  • Approval Phone Number: 281-483-8576

Mike’s Comment: Here’s another example where the industry recommends that we drive ground rods (supplementary electrodes – 250.54) for the purpose of reducing electric shock from a ground fault. The statement “However, the shock hazard can be precluded by the installation of an upgraded supplemental ground to the earth.” Is 100% false.

What is required is that an equipment grounding (bonding) conductor be bonded to every metal pole as required by the NEC so that all metal parts are bonded to an effective ground-fault current path [250.2 and 250.4(A)(3)].

I just can’t believe that we (me included) as an industry ever thought that a shock hazard could be precluded by the installation of an upgraded supplementary ground to the earth! Oh well… maybe my work will make a difference in educating the industry as to the danger of this type of thinking.

 

 

 

[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

To suggest a topic or submit content for a newsletter: nlsuggest@mikeholt.com
Experiencing a Problem? Contact our Webmaster

Comments
  • I wonder if current would prefer to travel thru a persons body rather than a metal pole dug deep in the ground supplemented by a ground rod in its effort to return to the source Y ground? Try calculating. You will get your answer.



Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter