This article was posted 09/23/2009 and is most likely outdated.

A Case of Stray Voltage in a Lake
 

 

Topic - Stray Voltage
Subject - A Case of Stray Voltage in a Lake

September 23, 2009
This newsletter was sent to 19945 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

The Case of Stray Voltage in a Lake


October 1, 2009 By Donald R. Johnson, P.E., Johnson Engineering (donjohn@silverstar.com)
Faulty concentric neutrals on high voltage underground cables was the cause of one drowning death and brain injury to two others while swimming in a lake.


Stray voltage is a popular term resulting from electrical currents flowing through the earth, or other conductive surfaces not normally expected to carry electric currents.  Small amounts of electric currents travelling through the earth are prevalent throughout the nation primarily due to electric utilities using the earth as a grounding medium for grounded wye distribution systems.  Even though these grounded wye systems do carry a neutral conductor return current path since the neutral conductor is grounded to the earth at multiple locations, (as required by the NESC), the result is the earth is a parallel path for these currents.  Typically, depending upon the conductivity of the earth and the amount of return neutral current on the electric distribution system, the amount of current flowing through the earth is small.  As electric loads across the nation continue to increase, these earth currents are also increasing.  These earth currents became noticeable many years ago on dairy farms.  The dairy farmers noticed a significantly higher mortality rate among the dairy cows along with a major loss of milk production.  The culprit was directly tied to the amount of earth currents flowing through the dairy facilities.  Electric utilities across the nation have found out the hard way (through multi-million dollar lawsuits) that they must reduce these earth currents to non-damaging levels. 


The Scene:   
Six teenagers were enjoying a cool evening in an outdoor hot tub in a home near a small lake.  Several of the teenagers decided to exit the hot tub and run out onto a small dock (owned by the homeowner) and jump into the lake.


  C:Documents and SettingsDonLocal SettingsTemporary Internet FilesContent.WordDSC00157.jpg
Photo of the dock where the accident occurred.

The Accident:
The teenagers were swimming near the dock for several minutes when they began to notice electric currents flowing through their bodies.  One boy who experienced the phenomena at the site describes the currents as causing him to lose muscle control such that he could no longer swim and he began sinking in the water.  Several of the teenagers that were on the dock saw the swimming teenagers’ plight and called to the adults in the house for help.  Several of the adults came running out, called 911, and began diving into the water trying to retrieve the teenagers that were under the water (Note: It was determined during later testing that the currents in the water were intermittent thus not causing damage to the adults.).  After multiple dives the adults were able to retrieve the two boys and one girl that were under the water.  CPR was immediately administered until the paramedics arrived.  After the three were taken to the hospital the outcome was that one boy drowned and the other boy and girl received brain damage due to lack of oxygen caused by near-drowning.
 
The Investigation:
The first thoughts by those at the scene after the accident was that the dock wiring was somehow faulty which caused the electric current to be in the water.  My services as a professional electrical engineer were then engaged by attorneys representing the plaintiffs (who filed suit against the electric utility and others) to try to determine the cause of the electric currents in the lake water.  After numerous investigations by me and other experts, it was determined that the dock wiring was not the cause of the electric currents in the lake water.  I later determined through discovery from the electric utility that they had major corrosion problems with the bare concentric neutrals of their high voltage underground cables that were buried under and around the lake where the accident occurred.  


The electric utility realized up to nine years prior to the accident, through concentric neutral testing procedures, that the bare concentric neutrals were in a serious state of deterioration throughout the lake area and the housing subdivision around the lake.  Even though the electric utility realized the problems they were having with the deteriorated concentric neutrals in the area they didn’t seem to realize the importance of immediately fixing the problem.  They began a multi-year program of replacing the bare concentric neutral cables with new jacketed concentric neutral cables in the area.  However due to difficulty in installing new cable in two particular sections of underground cable under and around the lake, these sections were not replaced.  It turned out that these two particular sections of underground cable that were not replaced were the primary paths for the neutral current return for the entire lake area subdivision back to the electric utility substation source.  The result was that the electrical load within the subdivision was essentially on an “island” in terms of an adequate return current path.  Because of this “island” effect the currents took the least resistant path into the lake water heading to the dock which was more than adequately grounded to the electric utility system overhead neutral which was then tied directly to the utility substation source.


To verify the above scenario numerous tests were completed by me during several site visits.  During one visit a Fluke Model 289 recording multimeter was installed at the dock where the accident occurred and left to record for eight to ten consecutive days (The wiring to the dock was totally disconnected and removed at this time.).  The voltages were recorded by placing a ground rod off the end of the dock into the lake water where one meter probe was attached.  The other meter probe was attached to the house ground which was in turn attached to the electric utility ground.  A 500-ohm shunt resistor was included in the voltage measuring circuit.  The currents were measured using the same technique however the 500-ohm resistor was placed in series with the circuit.  The results of the testing indicated that both the voltage and current levels followed the electric loads of the utility in that the load peaks were at the highest levels during the morning and evening hours (Note that the accident occurred during the evening hours when electric loads were at the highest.).  In addition the frequency of all voltage and current measurements were measured at 60 Hz.  This was a direct indication that the electric utility was the source of these measured voltages and currents.  The highest currents measured during this test period reached .5 amperes and the highest voltage reached 6.2 volts. 


During another visit to the site, with the electric utility present to allow access to their underground cable junction enclosures, numerous readings were conducted to measure the current on both the underground electric utility energized phase conductors and the concentric neutrals.  Voltage measurements were also taken from the ground system in the enclosures to a remote ground.  The results indicated that indeed the concentric neutrals in the two particular critical sections were likely non-existent.  In one particular section right near the lake the neutral current on the concentric neutral was less than one-tenth of an ampere whereas the energized phase current was in excess of 6 amperes.  Obviously the remainder of the return current was flowing through the earth and in this case the lake water.  In addition the voltage measured from these same junction enclosures was in excess of 7 volts to a remote ground rod.  These measurements were a clear indication that the concentric neutrals on these underground sections were likely absent due to corrosion.


The Conclusion:
Using an assumed human body resistance of 300ohms1 when i
mmersed in fresh water and assuming a current range through the human body where muscle control is lost in the range of 6 to 30 milliamperes2 using Ohm’s law the voltage necessary to cause a drowning in fresh water is in the range of 1.8 to 9 volts, 60 Hz AC.  The above testing results show that the necessary voltage and current levels were at a level well within the range to cause the drowning and near-drowning of the victims of this case.

This case went to a trial by jury and the jury awarded the plaintiffs a total judgment of $2,325,000.  No appeal was filed by the electric utility defendant.

This case shows the dramatic effects of stray voltage especially in an area where people are exposed to stray voltages when in a wet environment.  Electric utilities must be vigilant in maintaining their distribution systems such that stray voltages are kept at extremely low levels such that humans and animals alike are not exposed to these dangers.  As electric loads continue to increase across the nation many experts are even encouraging electric utilities to modify their distribution systems so that the earth is not used as a current carrying medium.
           

 

1. “Stray Voltages – Concerns, Analysis and Mitigation” National Electric Energy Testing Research & Applications Center (NEETRAC) Manual Project Number 00-092, August 2002, Page 5-24.

 

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

 
Comments
  • I'm not sure there is sufficent deturant stopping electric utilites from this kind of negligence. NYC is known for having stray voltage problems, as are, I'm sure, other major cities. This is a fixable issue, which doesn't require any advances in technology other than the budgets to be allocated.

    Stray Voltage
    Reply to this comment

  • I was at a lake, and you think about accidents like this before you jump off a dock into the water.

    jim
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike great article showing a dealth can result with as little 20 milli amps due to lose of muscle control 20 ma is the value I use in my class that states lose muscile control and can't let go , I never heard of a dealth from 20 mille amps. I know that is take 60 volts for electricity to get into your body but didn't know 20 ma can kill you.I'm glad you posted this article make you think just how dangerous mill amp and bad neutrals connection can kill Thanks for telling me Mike John your student for ever.

    John Hall
    Reply to this comment

  • It is horrifying that this still happens. It is a shame that this problem exists only because of money.

    Utilities should be forced to modify their distribution systems so that the earth is not used as a current carrying medium - Government stimulus money (we are fixing bridges, why not the distribution system) could be used to fix this problem and it wold keep people employed.

    Wilbur101
    Reply to this comment

  • I have been following this story since the jury award was announced. I have not seen any comments or concern about low voltage circuits. In fact NFPA 70E has a FPN after the definition of "Electrical Hazard" that states in part "low voltage lighting systems, and similar sources are examples of circuits or systems that are not considered an electrical hazard." Also, the NEC, in 110.27, sets 50 volts as the threshold for guarding against accidental contact with live parts. John Hall's comment mentions 60 volts as required level for current to enter the body. In Don Johnson's article the voltage that caused loss of muscle control was below 7 volts. I think it is time to reexamine voltage levels as far as the effect on the human body. The arbitary level of 50 volts may need to go away and maybe we need to look at low voltage lighting systems from a different prespective. Maybe I am missing something but it concerns me that a small amount of voltage can cause a small amount of current to flow through the body and cause injury or death.

    Robert Jones
    Reply to this comment

  • Don--as you may already know, Don Zipse has published a paper that described the current paths through a swimming pool and Jim with Harbor Marine has documented additional cases that resulted in death from electrocution fresh water drowning.

    This is a tragic result and one that could have been prevented if the utility had replaced the line when they first became aware of the problem--do you know if the person or persons responsible for the decision to not replace line were held accountable for his/her/their decision?

    Can these same currents be present even if the bare concentric neutrals are intact?

    You are correct, dairy farmers have had severe stray voltage problems due to the utilities using earth as a conductor in parallel with the Primary Neutral. It is a known fact that if the utilities simply provide highly efective isolation of the dairy farms, the dairy farms can wire their farms following the NEC as a minimum to keep their secondary neutral current on the neutral and the fault and leakage is then the only current on the grounding conductor; this is commonly known as a 4-wire single phase and a 5-wire 3 phase secondary distribution. Do you have an expert opinion on this practice?

    I noticed that you cited the NEETRAC 2002 publication which is also published as CRN (Cooperative Research Network) National Rural Electric Association Project 01-13B titled Stray Voltage, Concerns, Analysis and Mitigation. This publication (to the best of my in my knowledge) is available to all Electric Cooperative member/owners. I find this publication to be an excellent stray voltage publication and in my humble opinion as a dairy farmer, is a far superior to USDA 696. Do you have an expert opinion on this publication?

    Chuck Untiedt
    Reply to this comment

  • I appreciate the fact that you were able to locate the source of the problem. So offen technicain give up on trouble shooting a problem. They call it an "electrical phnonmon" because they cann't figure it out. I have never see the term "concentric neutral" used before. Could you please explain it to me? Also on a side note there is a very simple way that all power companies can test and monitor current leakage on there systems, by using a clamp-on amp meter on the grounded side of the neutral to the grounding electrode. We made simular test when testing commercial and industrial plants for simular problems. Thank again.

    Carmen
    Reply to this comment

  • This is a very well written report and is technically as accurate as it can be, but I'll take issue with the statement that systems must be designed so that the earth is never used a s a current carrying medium. That is simply impossible. The very nature of earth grounding puts the earth in a parallel path with the grounded conductor and.In the case of lightning or power line breakage the earth bcomes a deadly source of fault current. Another point is that there is a tendancy-even among professionals-to regard the neutral conductor a harmless kitty cat. Quite the opposite is of course true. It is potentially very dangerous. How many times have you seen someone break two legs on a circuit where they just have the SPST switch in the hot leg open?

    Bob
    Reply to this comment

  • Is this the case where the utility admitted no fault, paid a big award but still refused to repair the problem??

    Don Hartley/ Hartley Electric
    Reply to this comment

  • Maybe,on one from the utility company swim's in that lake?

    Colin
    Reply to this comment

  • Don/Mike-

    As I have mentioned before, I grew-up a couple miles from where this took place. I noticed that your report is dated October 1st. May I forward this e-mail to the public officials after that date?

    Would you like to be BCC'd on it?

    Thank you BOTH for all your efforts.

    Dale Grant
    Reply to this comment

  • I wonder if the fine was less than the original cost to upgrade the utility conductors. Large companies often budget for a certain number of liability settlements. "Pleasure doing business with you" is the old motto I guess.

    Perry
    Reply to this comment

  • DON:Great Article It would appear from the newspaper article the utlity will be doing nothing to correct this problem. Do you know what type of precautions the other adjacent landowners are taking before swimming in this water? Can this property be sold without providing full disclosure to prospective purchasers of this "electrical deficiency". Has this stray current now devalued the property value of all the surrounding properties? Is there a "higher electrical juridictional authority" that can force this utility to clean up their system?

    Patrick Lynch
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter