This article was posted 10/20/2005 and is most likely outdated.

The Path Lightning Takes Once it’s in the Earth
 

 
Topic - Lightning and Surge Protection
Subject - The Path Lightning Takes Once it’s in the Earth

October 20, 2005 

| Ask a Question |  Code Graphic Code Quiz Free Stuff Instructors | Feedback
Online Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
  Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    
The Path Lightning Takes Once it’s in the Earth

 

Mike,

 

From 1991 to 1994 I did some research in the high voltage laboratory at Mississippi State University, which is shown at http://www.ece.msstate.edu/hvl/.

 

The project goals were to find out what happens to lightning current once it leaves the bottom of a lightning rod and heads down into Mother Earth, and also to find out whether the 60Hz current from a lightning-struck power line will follow that lightning current down into the earth.

 

The answers were that, at least in the sand we used, lightning current follows discrete paths very much like those that it follows in air (and, it turns out, in water as well) and that the power current from a struck power line will indeed follow the path of lightning from the power line, over the insulator, down the pole, out the lightning ground into the earth and thence to any good ground, such as a buried pipe.

 

Even though the lightning current is very brief and produces only a small pit in a buried pipe (we used half-inch electrical conduit,) the power line current that follows the ionized path produced by that lightning current will burn a hole right through a buried pipe.  This is because the fault current from a power line through previously-ionized soil is limited only by the impedance of the power line.  It continues to flow until the substation's instrumentation detects the fault and opens the circuit breaker, typically in a few cycles.  The effect is rather dramatic.

 

We used 600kV impulses from a big Marx generator, which produces authentic lightning impulses as defined by IEEE.  The power line current was supplied by a 15kV 'power follow' transformer, which has very low impedance and can supply very large currents.  The role of the earth was played by a big dumpster filled with eleven tons of fill sand from the local gravel pit, and the lightning ground was a standard copper-clad ground rod.  A fairly extensive computer simulation showed that, while the walls of the dumpster were in fairly close proximity to our ground electrode, this didn't affect the path taken by the currents.

 

The long literature review for the project shows that, over the years, many researchers have found that lightning currents obey their own rules and don't behave like the 60Hz currents that are the major concern of grounding experts like you.  A good deal of work on the subject was done by Bell Laboratories in the 1940's (I think--I'll have to check the bibliography) and by various theoretical researchers and engineers through the 1980's, when the major concern was not lightning, but the electromagnetic impulses produced by nuclear weapons.

 

If you'd like, I can send you a copy of the journal paper we published and, if you have difficulty in sleeping, a copy of the graduate dissertation done on the subject.  I'll also be glad to answer any further questions on the subject to the extent that I can.  I believe that further research on the subject has been done since, but I'm afraid I haven't kept track of it to any great degree.

 

The reference for the journal article is "A Damage Mechanism: Lightning-Initiated Fault-Current Arcs" IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 35, No. 1, Jan/Feb 1999

 

Thanks for your newsletters.  I enjoy reading them.  You're performing a great service to the industry and to people everywhere by promoting safety in electrical installations in such an effective manner. 

 

God bless, indeed.

 

Mark Kinsler, PhD

http://www.mkinsler.com

 

Mike’s Comment: Thanks Mark for taking the time to share this with me/us. Maybe someone reading this has more information and I’ll pass it along as well.

 

[ View More Newsletters ] [ Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments ]

Grounding versus Bonding Textbook
Grounding versus Bonding textbook is loaded with detailed color-coded graphics so you can easily differentiate between grounding and bonding. This text gets to the root of all problems associated with grounding and bonding. Subject includes: Circuit and System Grounding, Grounding Electrode System and Grounding Electrode Conductor, Enclosure, Raceway, and Service Cable Grounding, Bonding, Methods of Equipment Grounding, Direct-Current Systems, and Grounding of Systems and Circuits.  

Product Code: 05NCT2
Price:
$39.00 each

 
[ Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments ] [ View More Newsletters ]

F o r w a r d   t h i s   N e w s l e t t e r   t o   a   F r i e n d !
Do you have a friend, relative, or colleague who you think would be interested in receiving this free newsletter? If so, we encourage you to forward this message along to them. If you received this email from someone else, and wish to receive your own free issues of our newsletter, sign up today!

C o n t a c t    I n f o r m a t i o n
   
 

Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Comments
  • A few years ago National Geographic did an excellant article on Lightning. For those of us who get alot out of pictures (your drawings being one) the photos and details were interesting.

    Richard

    PS Waiting in Vegas for the next class. You won't have to sell to anyone but locals. Building Officials, Contractors, Electrical Contractors etc. are eager to hear from you.

    Richard Franklin
    Reply to this comment

  • Thanks Mark, for the information.

    The experiment and the finding that the damage due to power frequency follow currents is more dramatic than that caused by lightning (at the ground electrode) is really interesting.

    Thanks for sharing and Thanks to Mike Holt for the informative news letters.

    Raghunath
    Reply to this comment

  • Hi, Mike. In reading the article about lihgtning current path, somehow, I seem to remember something about... the lightnig discharge takes place from the Earth to the sky......! Am I correct?. Or either theory is acceptable.

    Thank you, for your hard work. You're number one in my book.. !!! ----------------

    MS
    Reply to this comment

  • Last week there was an interesting TV show on PBS -NOVA Science Now. It was on lightning, and showed the research going on in Florida at the lightning research center where they shoot rockets with wires into clouds. It stated that nt research is not clear what starts lighting and the current theory on cloud to cloud equalizing charges may not be correct. The most current theory is lighting is started by cosmic rays (yes really). I am making a copy of the show and will mail it to Mike Holt.

    Tom Baker
    Reply to this comment

  • Enjoyed your article. I am involved with dwellings with lighting rod systems where the down conductors are installed on the interior of the building. If we look to FPN #2 of 250-106 it provides us a guide line to bond back to circuits etc. within a 6' and 3.5' distance. It just doesn’t say where this connection is to be made. Then U.L 96A 10.4 and 11.1 tell us one bond at the water pipe is sufficient. Would someone care to comment on this? Have a blessed day. Fred

    Enjoy your article

    Fred
    Reply to this comment

  • Thanks for the newsletters, illustrations, and videos. I enjoy reading them and sharing them with others here where I work. It sometimes simplifies some of the ambiguity in the trade manuals.

    Frank Soto
    Reply to this comment

  • Hi, Mike: Interesting article. Would you send me a copy of the 1999 IEEE article dealing with lightning strikes - I'm interested in finding out whether the article mentions a 'symmetrical component' analysis in dealing with unbalanced faults.

    Thanks,

    George

    George Erickson
    Reply to this comment


Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter