This article was posted 12/11/2008 and is most likely outdated.

2008 NEC Questions and Answers December
 

 

Topic - NEC Questions
Subject - 2008 NEC Questions and Answers December

December 11, 2008
This newsletter was sent to 30594 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

 NEC Questions Based on the 2008 NEC
December

Here is the follow up to yesterday’s newsletter. This includes all of the answers to the questions sent yesterday so you can see how you did.

By Mike Holt for EC&M Magazine

 

Q1. We are being told that we must bond our raceways containing phone cables to the cable tray when the raceway leaves the cable tray. How do we size the bonding conductor?

A1. Systems operating below 50V (such as communications systems) are not required to be grounded [250.20(A)], so there is no requirement to bond the raceways to anything.

 

Q2. What are the standard heights for mounting receptacles and switches in a commercial building?

A2. If the building or space is required to be accessible to disabled persons, the standard unobstructed reach ranges are from 15 to 48 in. [Section 308 of ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003].

 

Q3. How do I size the equipment grounding conductor for parallel conductors in a cable tray?

A3. When circuit conductors are run in parallel [310.4], an equipment grounding conductor must be sized in accordance with Table 250.122, based on the rating of the circuit overcurrent device [250.122(F)]. Remember that single conductors used as equipment grounding conductors in cable trays must be sized 4 AWG or larger [392.3(B)(1)(c)].

 

Q4. Where does the code address which way the grounding terminal of a receptacle goes (up or down)?

A4. Position of the ground terminal of a receptacle isn’t specified in the NEC. The ground terminal can be up, down, or to the side. Proposals to specify the mounting position of the ground terminal have been rejected through many Code cycles.

 

Q5. In a two family dwelling, is it legal to have the panel in one unit, so the other unit does not have access to it?

A5. No, each occupant must have ready access to the overcurrent devices for their occupancy [240.24(B)].

 

Q6. What is the difference between Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 circuits?

A6. 725.2 defines these circuits as:

 

Class 1 Circuit. That wiring system between the load side of the Class 1 circuit overcurrent device and the connected equipment such as relays, controllers, lights, audible devices, etc.

Author’s Comment: Class 1 nonpower-limited circuits can operate at up to 600V and the power output isn’t limited [725.41(B)].

 

Class 2 Circuit. The wiring system between the load side of a Class 2 power supply and the connected Class 2 equipment. Class 2 circuits are rendered safe by limiting the power supply to 100 VA for circuits that operate at 30V or less and the current to 5 mA for circuits over 30V [Chapter 9, Table 11].

Author’s Comment: Class 2 circuits typically include wiring for low-energy, low-voltage loads such as thermostats, programmable controllers, burglar alarms, and security systems. This type of circuit also includes twisted-pair or coaxial cable that interconnects computers for Local Area Networks (LANs) and programmable controller I/O circuits [725.121(A)(3)].

 

Class 3 Circuit. The wiring system between the load side of a Class 3 power supply and the connected Class 3 equipment. Figure 725−4

Author’s Comment: Class 3 circuits are used when the power demand exceeds 0.50 VA, but not more than 100 VA, for circuits over 30V [Chapter 9, Table 11].

 

Q7. We are being told that the 2008 NEC now has requirements for wearing personal protection equipment. Can you show us where in the Code we can find this?

A7. The NEC is an installation standard, so it does not address personal protection equipment (PPE).

 

Q8. Are there any rules regarding electrical outlets that are close to sinks in a school?

A8. All 15A and 20A, 125V receptacles installed within 6 ft of the outside edge of a sink must be GFCI protected [210.8(B)(5)].

 

Q9. Can we use Type NM Cable (Romex) in a four story apartment building?

A9. If your apartment building is constructed of (or permitted to be constructed of) Type III, IV or V construction, it may be used [334.10(2)].

 

Q10. Is there an exception to the 30-inch burial requirement for a ground ring?

A10. No, a ground ring encircling the building or structure, consisting of at least 20 ft of bare copper conductor not smaller than 2 AWG, must be buried not less than 30 in. [250.53(F)].

 

Q11. Is it legal to tape a white wire black and use it a phase conductor in a raceway?

A11. No, a conductor with white insulation can only be used for the ungrounded conductor in a raceway [200.7(C)].

 

Q12. Can a junction box contain both 277V and 120V conductors?

A12. Yes since all conductors have an insulation voltage rating not less than the maximum circuit voltage (277V) [300.3(C)].

 

Q13. Is it acceptable to install a ground rod at the base of light poles for a commercial parking lot?

A13. Acceptable? Yes. Required? No. Does it serve any safety purpose? No.

 

Q14. Can a GFCI receptacle be installed on an AFCI-protected circuit?

A14. Yes.

 

 

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

 
Comments
  • In question #13 is there a code article that states this?

    John Kielian
    Reply to this comment

  • Answer to Q11 in quiz does not seem to make sense. Do I understand that the "ungrouded" conductor can have white insulation? Jim

    Jim Shafer
    Reply to this comment

  • Q11. Is it legal to tape a white wire black and use it a phase conductor in a raceway?

    A11. No, a conductor with white insulation can only be used for the ungrounded conductor in a raceway [200.7(C)].

    No matter the Size?????

    Garry Cornell
    Reply to this comment

  • On the question about the white conductor it is a grounded conductor [neutral] not an ungrounded conductor.

    Rick Simpson
    Reply to this comment

  • Q13, If a lightning strike were to occur directly to the lightpole above a ground rod wouldnt it be a safer installation than if the nearest ground rod were 1/4 mile?

    Steven Webb
    Reply to this comment

  • Q13, If a lightning strike were to occur directly to the lightpole above a ground rod wouldnt it be a safer installation than if the nearest ground rod were 1/4 mile?

    Steven Webb
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike:

    What's your position regarding raceway bonding of telephone system cables that carry ringing voltages in excess of 50 Vac?

    Best regards, and thanks in advance,

    Jonathan Kramer

    You said: Q1. We are being told that we must bond our raceways containing phone cables to the cable tray when the raceway leaves the cable tray. How do we size the bonding conductor?

    A1. Systems operating below 50V (such as communications systems) are not required to be grounded [250.20(A)], so there is no requirement to bond the raceways to anything.

    Jonathan Kramer, Esq.
    Reply to this comment

  • Please explain how grounding each pole does not make it safer.

    Sherman
    Reply to this comment

  • so we use some uf sleeved in a raceway to serve say a 240 volt ac unit. we tape the white black to identify the conductor. Have we violated the code?

    joe stewart
    Reply to this comment

  • The answer to A11 should read grounded conductor not ungrounded.

    RV
    Reply to this comment

  • I think question 3 should be: Do I need to run parallel ground conductors in a cable tray for a 800A circuit. The phase conductors would be 2 sets of 500 or 600kcmil cables, but can you only use one 1/0 ground conductor for the egc? I say only one ground conductor is needed based on 250.122 F.

    Bert DaSilva
    Reply to this comment

  • question #1 800.110

    bborowicz
    Reply to this comment

  • Regarding Q1 and bonding metallic raceway carrying phone cables. I believe that 250.104(B) as well as 250.4(A)(4) would require bonding this system. You argue that chapter 8 is excluded from the rest of the code by 90.3. This is irrelevant! Water piping and gas piping and structural building steel is not governed by the NEC, but they need to be bonded. The phone cable raceway IS covered by chapter 250 because it is “Other Metal Piping”, no matter what is contained within it.

    Greg Porter
    Reply to this comment

  • I disagree with the third part of your answer to Question # 13. You state that the rod serves no safety function.

    I agree that there is no requirement for a ground rod at a light pole in a commercial parking lot, however I offer the following reasons why it can be a safety issue with out a local rod attached to the poles ground stud.

    1. If there is no local ground rod connected to the pole nor a ground wire down through the pole base to earth there is a greater potential for the pole to become energized by a shorted phase wire or defective ballast and remain at some voltage potential above earth. Given that the branch circuit equipment grounding conductor should prevent this by carrying the fault current to the source panel causing the overcurrent device to trip, however it is not uncommon to find the grounding conductor connections in pole bases and outside junction boxes either loose, corroded or disconnected rendering them useless. At least with a ground rod attached or other grounding earth conductor through the base to earth the pole is held at the same potential as the surrounding earth or wet asphalt that a person touching the pole would be standing on.

    2.) The second reason is to safely conduct any nearby cloud or lightning induced transient voltages and current to ground. Where poles in parking lots have no individual ground rods or earth connections these transient voltages follow the branch circuit feeder path into the building to the source panel ground and in some cases will trip feeder breakers or main breakers with ground fault protection.

    3.)NOTE: The solution to prevent these transients from entering the building on the branch circuit ground is to provide a path to ground at each poles. At the minimum a rod should be installed at the pole with the home run conduit. Additionally, the installation of a surge protection device inside the home run pole base in addition to the external ground rod will prevent these occurances.

    I offer the above comments from my first hand experiences over many years of testing and correcting these types of conditions.

    Thank you for reviewing this post and I wecome return comments,---Larry LeSueur CPQ, CBCP, Atlanta, Ga.

    Larry Lesueur CPQ, CBCP
    Reply to this comment

  • On question #5 To answer your question correctly the answer would be YES it does have a reference in the NEC, however FPN notes are only advisory and therefore not mandatory.

    In section 110-16 pertaining to waring labels when working on energized circuits --FPN #1 refers to NFPA 70E-2004 Standards for electrical safety in the workplace. And FPN #2 refers to ANSI Z535.4-1998 Product safety sings and labels.

    john gary
    Reply to this comment

  • Regarding Q1 I understand that telephone caries 70 to 90 volt ring voltages or at least they used to. Just hold the wires and I'll give you a call. if you jump then I thing the raceway should be bonded. Anyone may certainly correct me if I am wrong since I'd like to end the requirement to bond these raceways in our jurisdiction.

    mike
    Reply to this comment

  • typo in A11. should read grounded conductor

    Bob
    Reply to this comment

  • A solution to switch height that I did in an elementary school was to install a second set of light and fan switches below the adult height switches. ( 1 set of switches for adults and another for 1 st grade and kindergarden.) I then opened up the wall, lowered the drain pipe, and then whacked 6 or 7 inches off of the sink vanity. The children loved it because they had a set of switches and a sink that they could reach.

    The complaint about handicapped access to outlets and switches is that 1 location that is not too low for ordinary people is really too high for some people. A good solution is 2 sets of stuff at 2 different heights. Actually, a room does need for some of the outlets to be at the same height as the light switches to facilitate vacuuming.

    Michael R. Cole
    Reply to this comment

  • WHO ABOUT THE RULE OF THUMB THAT NO MORE THAN 300 V TO GROUND IN ONE BOX, ALSO TO SEPARATE 120 AND 277. THAT IS JUST DANGEROUS..

    DAVID KLEIN
    Reply to this comment

  • Q7. We are being told that the 2008 NEC now has requirements for wearing personal protection equipment. Can you show us where in the Code we can find this?

    A7. The NEC is an installation standard, so it does not address personal protection equipment (PPE). all questions reguarding PPE are addressed at this site http://www.nfpa.org/

    Don Dudek
    Reply to this comment

  • i just want to state for question 7 its in the NFPA 70E it states that anything over 50v requires gloves, glassesand a long sleeve flame retardant shirt and 277v and up requires a full body suit with full face guard and properly insulated gloves. just passing along this info

    joe
    Reply to this comment

  • Q13. Is it acceptable to install a ground rod at the base of light poles for a commercial parking lot?

    A13. Acceptable? Yes. Required? No. Does it serve any safety purpose? No.

    Actually it does serve a purpose--Ohms law would show that adding even a ground rod with a given resistance in the parallel path of a fault would result in a lower impedance and therefore more current would flow clearing the overcurrent device more quickly.

    Roland Miller
    Reply to this comment

  • A ground rod IS required at an isolated light pole IF it is served by more than one branch circuit.

    A local ground rod is also useful, if installed properly, for conducting lightning current in the event the pole is struck by lightning,

    Local grounding MAY, if properly done, reduce step potential, but a ground rod by itself would not accomplish this.

    Tom Smith, P.E.
    Reply to this comment

  • please remove our email from you list.

    thanks

    .
    Reply to this comment

  • WOW I have never seen so many rebuttals or counter points about one subject, since it isn't even a code requirement ( ground rods at light poles) My E-mail is getting to full so why not lets end this topic on a high note - enough.

    john gary
    Reply to this comment

  • If I understand question 11 correctly, it asks if a conductor that is normally only allowed to be used as a grounded one can be used as an ungrounded one. The answer duplicates the question, but doesnt mention the black tape.

    Mike
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter