This article was posted 09/07/2007 and is most likely outdated.

Article 547 Agricultural Buildings - 547.5
 

 
Subject - Article 547 Agricultural Buildings - 547.5
Based on - NEC - 2005 Edition

September 7, 2007
This newsletter was sent to 26744 newsletter subscribers
 

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

Article 547   Hi Res - Cable/DSL [5887Kb]
VIEWING Video FILE requires
Real Media Player [ FREE ]
   
Agricultural Buildings

547.5 Wiring Methods

The rules for GFCI protection of receptacles were relocated from 547.10(B) to 547.5(G). In addition, general-purpose receptacles located in dirt confinement areas for livestock must now be GFCI protected.

(G) GFCI Protected Receptacles
GFCI protection is required for all 15 and 20A, 125V general-purpose receptacles located:
Figure 547-1
(1) In areas having an equipotential plane in accordance with 547.10(A).
(2) Outdoors.
(3) In damp or wet locations.
(4) In dirt confinement areas for livestock.


Author’s Comment: The term “general-purpose receptacles” isn’t defined in the NEC, but the intent is that GFCI protection isn’t required for receptacles installed specifically for equipment such as brooders, incubators, feed mixers, feed grinders, feed conveyors and the like.


Figure 547-1
(Click on image to enlarge)

       
 

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

Comments
  • To quote:"Not every safety measure is worthwhile",from a monetary standpoint, perhaps not. That is why authorities having jurisdiction can choose to abide by the NEC or not.

    This "reflexive reaction" induced safety measure you use as an example,appears to be motivated by liabilty issues.

    Mark Prairie
    Reply to this comment

  • I REALLY ENJOY THIS SITE. I THINK GFCI PROTECTION ON FARMS SHOULD BE MANDATORY. HOWEVER IN THE SATE OF MICHIGAN THERE IS NO INSPECTION FOR FARMS. FARMERS DO THEIR OWN WIRING WHETHER IT IS SAFE OR NOT. THANKS FOR LISTENING.

    MIKE KIRN
    Reply to this comment

  • Explain the use of romex in a agriculture bldg. In my opinon romex is acceptable because this is not a classified area.

    Ray_Valdez@prbd.com
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike-

    If you are going to use the picture you need a person shoving the cow onto and into the milking parlor since cows are smarter than many humans as cows will not step onto an equipotential plane. After all an equipotential is nothing more than a Fignment of the Imagination of certain Code members and Ag professors who lack the understanding between continuous low magnitude current and instaneous short current of high magnitude.

    Donald W. Zipse, P.E.
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike, as usual, your information is excellent and accurate. This brings to mind an ongoing problem with the NEC especially as it applies to relatively new technology such as GFCI and AFCI protection. With each new invention to improve safety, comes added cost.

    No one seems to care about the cost when adding code requirements. GFCI protection for agricultural buildings as required by Article 547 does without a doubt improve safety. The increased AFCI protection required by the new NEC will most certainly save lives and property. These all come with a price. Some believe that the price is insignificant compared to the price of the home or building. Think of it as a 25 cent increase in the price of gasoline.

    What about the small family farmer who can barely afford the electric bill? When small businesses go under, larger businesses can charge more. When a giant retailer builds in a small town and puts the mom and pop stores out of business they regretfully raise prices while telling everyone how much they are saving. When all of the family farms become office parks, retail centers, and subdivisions, the large corporate owned farms can then dictate what we eat and how much we pay for our food.

    We need a balance between safety and cost.

    PJ
    Reply to this comment

  • GFI proctection for agricultural building as required by Article 547 will this article go under largr baird houses

    harold
    Reply to this comment


Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter