This article was posted 08/04/2006 and is most likely outdated.

Grounding vs Bonding: 250.130 Equipment Grounding (Bonding) Conductor Connections
 

 
Subject - Grounding vs Bonding: 250.130 Equipment Grounding (Bonding) Conductor Connections

August 4, 2006  

| Ask a Question |  Code Graphic Code Quiz - All New! |  Free Stuff Instructors | Feedback
Online Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
[ image1 Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

PART VII.   Hi Res - Cable/DSL [4626Kb]
VIEWING Video FILE requires
Real Media Player [ FREE ]
 
Sections

250.130 Equipment Grounding (Bonding) Conductor Connections.

(A) For Grounded Systems. The service disconnecting means supplied by a grounded utility system must have the grounded neutral service conductor bonded to the service-disconnect enclosure in accordance with 250.24(C). The grounded neutral service conductor must also be bonded to the grounding (earthing) electrodes [250.24(A)] and the equipment grounding (bonding) conductors.

(B) For Ungrounded Systems. The service disconnecting means supplied by an ungrounded utility system must have the service-disconnect enclosure grounded to a grounding electrode in accordance with 250.24(E). The equipment grounding (bonding) conductors must also be bonded to the grounding (earthing) electrodes [250.130(B)].

(C) Nongrounding Receptacle Replacement or Branch-Circuit Extensions. Where a nongrounding receptacle is replaced with a grounding-type receptacle, or when a branch-circuit extension is made from an outlet box that doesn’t contain an equipment grounding (bonding) conductor, the grounding contacts of the receptacle must be grounded (bonded) to one of the following (effective ground-fault current path): Figure 250–176

(1) Grounding electrode system [250.50] (which is bonded to the grounded neutral service conductor).

(2) Grounding electrode conductor (which is bonded to the grounded neutral service conductor).

(3) Panelboard equipment grounding terminal.

(4) Grounded neutral service conductor.

Author’s Comment: A branch-circuit extension is not permitted to be made from an outlet box that doesn’t have an equipment grounding (bonding) conductor, unless an equipment grounding (bonding) conductor for the circuit extension is run as specified in 250.130(C)(1) through (4). Figure 250–177

FPN: A grounding-type receptacle can replace a nongrounding type receptacle, without having the grounding terminal grounded (bonded) to an effective ground-fault current path, if the receptacle is GFCI protected and marked in accordance with 406.3(D)(3). Figure 250–178

Author’s Comment: But this rule does not apply to new grounding-type receptacles placed on a branch-circuit extension from an existing outlet box that does not have an equipment grounding (bonding) conductor.


Figure 250–176
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250–177
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250–178
(Click on image to enlarge)

   

[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

To suggest a topic or submit content for a newsletter: nlsuggest@mikeholt.com
Experiencing a Problem? Contact our Webmaster

Comments
  • You last Authors comments on this page seem to conflict with all of the other data on this page. Where am I wrong.

    John K. Erickson
    Reply to this comment

  • You last Authors Comments on the bottom of this page below 250.130 (c) (4) seem to conflict with the rest of this page. Tell me were I am wrong. We are constantly see were home owners are changing out the ungrounded recpt. and installing new grounded type. It is my understanding that this is a NEC violation as you pointed out. Your final comment seems to nullify all of the above statement though.

    John K. Erickson
    Reply to this comment

  • The comment is in error. I'll remove it in the archived version and in my 2008 textbook. Thank you.

    Mike Holt
    Reply to this comment


Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter