Visit MikeHolt.com
CSST Electrical Dangers  

 

Image

Over the last several years fires have occurred that have been attributed to the failure of CSST when hit by lightning.

An article by Mark Goodson, P.E. and Lee Green, P.E. has been brought to our attention, and we felt that it was important to share with you.

There has been much discussion regarding the bonding and grounding of CSST. The manufacturers believe that their instructions pointed the installer to so-called direct bonding, but their instructions also warned the user to follow the NEC. The CSST Industry has maintained that direct bonding and grounding will help prevent CSST from receiving lighting damage.

CSST (Corrugated Stainless Steel Tubing) has been used for approximately two decades to pipe and deliver fuel gas in businesses and residences in lieu of conventional black pipe. Lightning vulnerability of CSST has been documented in research. Goodson and Green outline another issue that is posed by the use of CSST – its impact on the ability of overcurrent devices to promptly clear electrical faults that are present within a structure.

Click on the image or follow this link to read their report. http://goodsonengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/A-Hidden-CSST-Electrical-Danger.pdf

 

Related reading:

Investigating the Casual Link between Lightning Strikes, CSST and Fire, Mark Goodson, Mark Hergenrether

Defects in Corrugated Stainless Steel Tubing (CSST) – Parker Waichman LLP

 

 

 

 

Click Here to Post a Comment Click Here to View Comments Click Here to Unsubscribe
 
Image
 
Visit: Exam Preparation | Continuing Education | Code Products | Newsletters | and more
Copyright© Mike Holt Enterprises of Leesburg, Inc. All Rights Reserved This article is protected by United States copyright laws and may not be published without prior written permission.
Mike Holt Enterprises of Leesburg, Inc. 3604 Parkway Blvd. Suite 3 Leesburg, FL 34748
"... as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." [Joshua 24:15]
Comments
  • It seems the broader issue is with gas piping generally, as it may have higher than expected impedance. I note that threaded connections, even with black pipe, are typically treated with (non conductive) sealants.

    I've seen at least one gas fire result from a confluence of an ungrounded appliance with a ground fault to black pipe gas connection (IR heating likely damaging thread sealers); another in which fittings merely glowed red from a poor service ground and lost service neutral that resulted in excessive current through gas piping despite bonding.

    Both events occurred in aged electrical systems installed under older NEC rules and which, due to ravages of time and poor maintenance, were not as robust as a new installation might be. I imagine that appropriately safe installation of any new product needs to be predicated on the way it might behave in an environment with such older installations, and appreciate the input from a electrical engineering perspective.

    My plumber is planning to install a short section of CSST as the particular installation would be difficult otherwise. Since it is in my own home, my plan is to bond the appliance, gas fittings and my copper water line with #6 Cu, all liberally coated with an appropriate antioxidant compound.

    Paul Lazorko  February 3 2016, 2:21 pm EST
    Reply to this comment

  • Very interesting, we need to find a way to insulate the CSST from the equipment so no current will flow it, The equipment should be allready

    Rodney Richley  January 20 2016, 10:51 am EST
    Reply to this comment

  • Didn't this test also test the black wrapped? If it's the same type of line with a black wrap and a coaxial bond. According to the Texas study it didn't matter I it was yellow or black.

    Mark Yates  January 20 2016, 8:33 am EST
    Reply to this comment

  • In my area, the practice of using the yellow CSST is no longer approved. Contractors are now using a black jacketed version that according to mfgr specs doesn't need bonding.

    Tom  January 20 2016, 6:38 am EST
    Reply to this comment
  • Reply from: inspector mike   February 3 2016, 8:26 am EST
    According to one gastite rep, the black type (flashshield) can be bonded by way of connection to equipment that has an electrical equipment ground in the branch circuit. How do you feel about this statement.
    Reply to inspector mike


  • Mike,

    This article, which I have read several times still doesn't address if grounding the manifold due to the gas system not being bonded to earth (plastic line) would help bleed off the lighting strike. I have seen first hand that lighting jumped into or out of a csst line to a grounded furnace duct and proceeded to catch a joist on fire. I feel with having 38 years of electrical experience that grounding would be better than nothing. I understand the low voltage (120V) studies, but that situation is more rare than the lighting.

    Mark Yates  January 20 2016, 12:27 am EST
    Reply to this comment
  • Reply from: T.M.Haja Sahib   February 24 2016, 5:45 am EST
    The phenomenon ''Lighting jumped into or out of a csst line to a grounded furnace duct'' is called side flash which may be avoided by bonding.
    Reply to T.M.Haja Sahib

    Reply from: Mark Yates   February 24 2016, 8:18 am EST
    Yes, that's what I am saying that we need a standard and a way to ground these lines.
    Reply to Mark Yates

    Reply from: hajasahib@gmail.com   February 25 2016, 12:31 am EST
    However, if the separation distance of ungrounded metal of considerable dimensions and lightning protection system is sufficient, no bonding between the two may be required.
    Reply to hajasahib@gmail.com



Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter