This article was posted 02/18/2013 and is most likely outdated.

Mike Holt - Article 625 EV Charging System
header
EV Charging System - Article 625, based on the 2011 NEC
Based on - NEC - 2011 Edition

Article 625 – Electric Vehicle Charging System
Based on the 2011 NEC®

By Mike Holt, NEC Consultant for EC&M Magazine

In the past few years, there’s been a lot of hype about electric vehicles (EV). The hype has centered on the idea that they are a “green alternative,” but since most of our electricity is generated by burning coal that’s not actually true.

While it’s unlikely EVs will replace gasoline-powered cars any time soon, they do have their place and they are not new. Many early models of automobile were electric, and EVs have been in use ever since.

If you’ve worked in a factory or warehouse, you’ve probably seen an EV. A big advantage is they don’t have combustion fumes. Of course, there’s no free lunch. Electric lift trucks have their own issues. Someone repeatedly hauling heavy loads up ramps usually prefers to be driving an LP gas powered truck rather than an electric one.

Out on the golf course, where loads are light and you really don’t want the risk of oil leaks, electric golf carts are the preferred option. Inside airports and other areas where emission reduction is paramount, EVs are again the preferred choice.

These small, slow-moving off-road vehicles have charging requirements that small charging systems can easily meet. That is not the case with vehicles designed to carry passengers on roads at highway speeds. Such vehicles, especially an electric car or bus, weigh considerably more than a golf cart. So moving one takes a correspondingly larger motor. And moving it faster takes even more motor horsepower. This is why many designs use multiple drive motors.

While the electricity to power EVs comes over the power lines from generating stations, the fact that EVs have to be mobile means they must store that electricity to take it with them. The storage device of choice is the battery (there are other options, such as flywheel storage). At one time, you could bet it would be a lead-acid battery. Today, you’d want to place your bet on lithium batteries.

Sizing the battery for a given EV is a complex task, because of all the demands the EV must satisfy. For example, to replace an internal combustion engine car, an EV must be able to travel at highway speeds over distances roughly comparable to those traveled by their internal combustion engine counterparts.

A car has loads you typically don’t find on a golf cart, such as air conditioning, electric windows, stereo systems, windshield wipers, security systems, and window defrosters. We also expect our car to start in the summer heat and the winter cold.

For all these reasons, the battery system for an electrically-powered passenger vehicle is considerably larger than that for a golf cart or other typical off-road electric vehicle. Consequently, the charging system must be far more robust than, and able to deliver far more power than, the charger for a golf cart.

This is why the electrically-powered passenger vehicle needs a dedicated charging circuit. Making sure the charging circuit is safe is what Article 625 is about. This article provides the requirements for the electrical equipment needed to charge automotive-type electric and hybrid vehicles, including cars, bikes, and buses. It also applies to neighborhood electric vehicles (NEV) which are basically road certified golf carts. Article 625 does not apply to off-road, self propelled vehicles such as industrial trucks, hoist, lift trucks, golf carts, airline ground support equipment, tractors, or boats.

Any time you’re installing equipment and devices related to electric vehicle charging, Article 615 applies. This Article consists of five parts:
•           Part I—General. This includes scope, definitions, voltages, and listing/labeling requirements.
•           Part II—Wiring Methods. The focus is on the charging coupler requirements the manufacturer must meet. You don’t need to understand the details of this part. You meet its requirements by using the coupler provided by the manufacturer.
•           Part III—Equipment Construction. Most of this applies to the manufacturer also, but it does have a few requirements you need to know.
•           Part IV—Control and Protection. This provides the requirements for overcurrent protection and the disconnecting means. It’s short and pretty straightforward.
•           Part V—Supply Equipment Locations. The requirements for indoor sites differ from those of outdoor sites. As you might have guessed, ventilation is the difference.

Equipment construction
First, make sure that electrical materials, devices, fittings, and associated equipment are listed or labeled [625.5]. Also make sure the electric vehicle supply equipment has a listed system of protection against electric shock of personnel [625.22].

Electric vehicle supply equipment must be marked by the manufacturer “for use with electric vehicles.” [625.15]. If you don’t see those markings, something is wrong. Don’t assume that somehow the markings just inadvertently got skipped. You’ll have to track down this problem and correct it.

If you’re installing from a kit, don’t swap out parts. This is especially critical for any fasteners. Use the fasteners that come with the kit and tighten them to the torque specifications provided in the instructions. Pay attention and “walk it through” before assembling, because once you tighten the connection you really can’t do it over without getting new fasteners. Why is that? Because threaded fasteners have only half their design clamping power if re-used.

Electric vehicle supply equipment rated other than 15 or 20A, 125V must be permanently connected and fastened in place, unless it’s part of a system identified and listed as suitable for the purpose and meeting requirements of 625.18, 625.19, and 625.29 [625.13 and NFPA 70 TIA  11-2 for 625.13]. Connecting and fastening with fasteners you’ve already used isn’t actually permanent, because the connection can’t possibly stay tight. Therefore, re-using fasteners violates this code requirement.

Control and protection
The first step in sizing conductors and overcurrent protective devices (OCPDs) is to characterize the load. One part of that step is to determine which loads are continuous and which are noncontinuous. If a load can be expected to run three hours or more, you must consider it continuous [100]. It’s expected that an EV will take more than three hours to charge, so you must consider any electric vehicle charging load to be continuous [625.14].

Because these loads are continuous, it follows that overcurrent protection for supplying electric vehicle supply equipment must have a rating of not less than 125 percent of the maximum load of the electric vehicle supply equipment [625.21].

For that same reason, the conductors must also be sized no less than 125 percent of the continuous loads based on the terminal temperature rating ampacities as listed in Table 310.15(B)(16), before any ampacity adjustment [110.14(C)(1) and 210.19(A)(1)].

Electric vehicle supply equipment rated more than 60 amperes or more than 150V to ground, must have a disconnecting means that’s capable of being locked in the open position. You must install this at a readily accessible location. The provision for locking or adding a lock to the disconnecting means must be installed on (or at) the switch or circuit breaker. This has to remain in place with or without the lock installed [625.23].

Location, location, location
If you’re installing the system indoors, locate it so as to permit direct connection to the electric vehicle [625.29(A)]. You’ll need to consider the total distance, horizontally and vertically to the charging connection on the vehicle. The charging cable is only so long, and you need to allow for some slack. So what might, at first glance, appear to be an ideal location may turn out to be unacceptable.

Locate the coupling means at least 18 in. above the floor level, but not more than 4 ft above the floor level. Again, keep in mind the length of that charging cable.

Many garages have a faucet to facilitate cleaning. Article 625 does not specify, but don’t locate the system anywhere near these. It might even be necessary to move the plumbing, if nothing else to avoid having the user stand in a puddle.

If the electric vehicle supply equipment is listed or labeled as suitable for charging electric vehicles indoors without ventilation, then you don’t need to install mechanical ventilation. In all other cases, mechanical ventilation is required. Any such ventilation must include supply and exhaust equipment permanently installed and located to intake and vent directly to the outdoors [625.29(D)].

If you’re installing the system outdoors, the same requirements apply except you don’t need to worry about ventilation [625.30].

Planning the job
Before installing an EV charging system, scope out the location. Where would the vehicle(s) be parked and how easy would it be for people to use the charging equipment? Is there a water source nearby, and how do you protect against it?

Most of Article 625’s requirements boil down to following the manufacturer’s instructions and using only the listed and labeled components provided with the equipment. So read the instructions and inventory those components before starting the work. Then do a “walk through” of the installation. Make sure you have the correct torque wrenches and other equipment needed to complete each step.

Once you’re sure you have all the correct components, understand how to put them together, know which specialized tools you’ll need, and know where you’re going to install them, you’re ready to size the branch circuit conductors and protective device. You would do this the same way you’d do it for any other load per Articles 210 and 220. Just note that you’re sizing at 125% because this is a continuous load [625.14 and 625.21].

2011 Understanding the NEC Volume 2 Articles 500 820 - 11UND2
Taken from Mike Holt's 2011 Understanding the NEC® Volume 2 Textbook
To order your copy, please click here, or call 888-632-2633

footer
This newsletter was sent to 27475 Subscribers
Unsubscribe
Comments
  • Mike,

    I think that you are an amazing resource for electrical issues and insights, but I really think the intro to this article is biased and lousy.

    First off, as the first commenter stated, most of our electricity is not produced using coal. According to http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=427&t=3 only 42% is produced by coal, and this is diminishing rapidly (solar, wind, and natural gas are growing).

    Second, according to the research in California, almost 40% of EV owners have their own solar installation. A significant number also have access to "green" public electricity, as I do (100% non-fossil-fuel).

    Third, buying a gas car means for its 25+ year life, it will burn 100% petroleum and emit carbon. Even if an electric car "burns" 42% coal based on current production, it can take advantage of every environmental improvement automatically, including carbon sequestration and shift to "Green" alternatives over its lifespan.

    Finally, EVs have way more torque and motor control than fossil fuel. Electric motors are a far better way to control vehicles under load than any carbon-based fuel. You are aware that even diesel locomotives have electric motors for actual propulsion - because the motors have more torque and can be precisely controlled.

    There are real drawbacks to EVs. The Leaf's 80 mile range is not enough, and recharging needs to be faster. If you feel the need to be negative on EVs. then focus on these issues, not old, debunked stats.

    As far as charger installation goes, I would add two pieces of advice:

    - locate a home garage charger near the front of the garage, provided the supplied charge cable can reach the front of the car when parked nose-first. This will allow charging outside of the garage if another car has taken the space. - you should clarify Level I and II as well as CHAdeMO chargers. 110/120 is insufficient for regular EV charging. Level II (220/240) is adequate for off-peak charging only as it can take 8 hours to recharge. Many non-residential facilities will need CHAdeMO fast charge, which is a much larger undertaking, but worth it.

    Thanks

    Matthew Roche  February 25 2013, 3:01 pm EST
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike stated "most of our electricity is generated by burning coal"

    Not actually true.

    While coal is the largest producer, it has been under 50 percent for many years, and is still shrinking. Currently at about 42 percent and likely to shrink even more as natural gas and renewables are becoming cheaper and more plentiful.

    http://www.mees.com/en/articles/6348-electric-vehicles-on-their-way-to-mainstream-use

    Flying Sparks  February 20 2013, 11:50 am EST
    Reply to this comment

  • EV car are great, they emit no emmisions, yes we need better battery RD to get a better battery to fit the needs of a EV car. Here the deal, these cars can't do everything. you must fit a good candident for the car. I live in a retirement zone, 100,000 seniors. Golf carts and EV cars are plenytiful.Short trips and plenty of charge time. This is still cheaper then buying gas by about 50%. But to me, if your driving is local, you have a second form of transportation, You have installed solar on your house and sell back more then you buy, then EV car is right for you. It is a small percentage right now but that percentage will increase. My pick and always will be is the Hybred car, best of both world and making much better advances. PV

    perry vogler  February 20 2013, 9:27 am EST
    Reply to this comment

  • The chevrolet volt as well as the tesla motor vehicle rely alot on charging, tesla beiing out of reach for most buyers offers highway speeds and long driving distances up to 300+ miles on one charge, the draw back is the price is about 60,000 dollars but if you factor in that electricity would be equal to about 11 cents equal to one gallon of gas the savings age there. the volt is more relilable for short distances because if you run out the engine kicks in so if you are not near a charging station not a problem. also the way i see it is that charging stations should be considered the same way you would hook up a welding outlet, with a disconect and sized for the load + which most electricians are used to hooking up in industrial locations for maintance workers to work with. i see a great futue for tesla however the price has to come down or wages have to boost right now tesla is a rich mans toy, while the chevrolet volt is more practile. you newsletters are really great and keep the gray matter in the pink thank you very much for them. IBEW electrician, always open to new ideas and learning new concepts.

    Ralph Cinelli  February 19 2013, 9:14 am EST
    Reply to this comment

  • "Because threaded fasteners have only half their design clamping power if re-used."

    Not generally true any more than OCPD can't be re-used after it trips.

    Even among threaded fasteners there are all types. The loss of half the clamping power would be one of the more extreme losses. Most threaded fasteners are perfectly re-usable.

    It all goes back to design. If it says on the box "Don't Re-use" then don't re-use it. Those types of fasteners are meant to reach torques that physically deform the bolt. But if this were universally true we couldn't use lug nuts on our cars.

    PFalcon  February 19 2013, 7:35 am EST
    Reply to this comment

  • the sense from reading the article is that EVs are "hype" and not really so green. Not a pretty picture. It should be clear however that even burning coal it is better than the alternative oil on a number of fronts. Coal is a domestic product, and although it is nasty it is the lesser evil compared to oil since we do not have to use our military to secure coal these days. Secondly the overall efficiency of extracting coal to running and EV is arguably better than extracting oil to running and internal combustion engine. When was the last time we sent troops overseas to get coal on natural gas. With and EV it gets better and better as we transition to renewable energy. In Arizona it takes ~ 12 solar panels to create the energy an EV uses (on average). No war to get solar on my roof either.

    Randy  February 19 2013, 12:58 am EST
    Reply to this comment

  • [...In the past few years, there’s been a lot of hype about electric vehicles (EV). The hype has centered on the idea that they are a “green alternative,” but since most of our electricity is generated by burning coal that’s not actually true....]

    Without going into too many details, a Nissan leaf makes about 100mi/gal [http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/evsbs.shtml] That's about 3 times better than a very efficient gasoline car in its class. Even 'if' the electricity is generated by coal (there are other options these days), it's still extraordinary. Calling it hype is unnecessary at best and not what I expect from this forum, which is a fantastic reference for our industry.

    Andre  February 18 2013, 11:33 pm EST
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter