This article was posted 01/26/2012 and is most likely outdated.

Mike Holt Newsletters
 

 

Topic - Lightning and Surge Protection
Subject - Gas tubing fires linked to lightning raise concern

January 26, 2012
This newsletter was sent to 18817 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Continuing EducationQuizzes |  Free Stuff Instructors Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]  

Gas tubing fires linked to lightning raise concern

 

By KANTELE FRANKO, The Associated Press

ImageWESTERVILLE, Ohio — Reports of lightning-related fires and gas leaks in at least a dozen states have raised concerns about the use of flexible gas lines made of corrugated stainless steel tubing and have led to lawsuits, studies and efforts to better track the incidents.

Manufacturers have defended the plastic-coated metal tubing, known as CSST, which has become increasingly common in new homes since it was introduced domestically more than two decades ago. Fire officials and researchers are trying to determine whether to blame a faulty product, unsafe installation or something else for the blazes.

Four homes caught on fire in central Ohio over a stormy 12-hour period this summer. Genoa Township Fire Chief Gary Honeycutt said he believes lightning struck at or near the homes, and the electrical charge traveled along the CSST before jumping to a less resistant pathway nearby such as a metal ventilation duct. It then punctured a hole the size of a pencil tip in the tubing and created a gas leak that could ignite, he said.

Click here to read the full story from the Dayton Daily News.

 

Click here to post a comment

[ Post Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]
[ View More Newsletters ]

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

 

 
Comments
  • Thanks for the report as many do not see these reports from isolated news sources, I have been warning GC's and home owners including plumbers about this problem for a few years now, and I can not see a safe way to guard it from a direct lightning strike,

    The problem starts with what this product is being connected too, most appliances that are connected to it will have flues and or chimney's that penetrate the roof line and in many cases can be the highest point above a roof, this is like you are just asking for lightning to strike it, second the understanding of how lightning current propagates through a conductive path is very little understood by many who are evaluating on how to protect this product, lightning has a high frequency component that just like in radio frequencies can follow paths that make no sense to the basic laymen who only understand DC or low frequency AC such as the power supply to our houses, simply bonding one end of the gas supply system is not enough, as the lightning current can and will flow do to the high frequency impedance of this bonding path, what I can't believe is that I can't find any info on where someone who knows more about lightning who that would be more qualified to develop a protection method for this product has been doing any testing, if there has been it has not been made very public, and this is the University Of Florida, with their knowledge from test preformed at camp Blanding, this would have been where they should have gone a long time ago. One of the reasons I feel this hasn't been done is that with my knowledge of lightning I think the proper protection of CSST with the added extra cost of the product would render it not a very good cost alternative to other known safer methods of gas piping, I would expect that not only would providing a protection system of the flues or chimneys that rise above the roof line have to be done, but parallel bonding at the appliance back to the electrode system would also have to be done to lower the impedance path for the lightning energy back to the GES to limit the amount of energy of the lightning placed on the product.

    Wayne Foster  January 27 2012, 1:44 am EST

Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter