This article was posted 02/26/2009 and is most likely outdated.

2008 NEC Questions and Answers - February Part 2
 

 

Topic - NEC Questions
Subject - 2008 NEC Questions and Answers - February Part 2

February 26, 2009
This newsletter was sent to 22146 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

NEC Questions Based on the 2008 NEC

February – Part 2

 

Here is the follow up to yesterday’s newsletter. This includes all of the answers to the questions sent yesterday so you can see how you did.

 

By Mike Holt for EC&M Magazine

 

Q1. I'm selling my 30 year old home and the home inspector has asked me to replace the existing breakers with AFCI's in order to maintain code compliance. Is it required by law to update a structure to make it compliant with new codes?

A1. No. The NEC doesn’t address the maintenance of electrical equipment because the Code is an installation standard, not a maintenance standard [90.2(A)]. See NFPA 70B—Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance.

 

Q2. Can we use flexible metal conduit for the emergency lights in a hospital.

A2. Generally speaking, only nonflexible metal raceways or Schedule 80 PVC conduit can be used for the mechanical protection of emergency system in a hospital [517.30(C)(3)]. Flexible metal conduit can be used, however if it is fished into an existing wall and is not subject to physical damage [517.30(C)(3)(c)].

 

Q3. We have a large electrical service that consists of twelve raceways in parallel. Can I use one conductor to bond them all, and if so, how do I size it?

A3. No, you may not use one conductor to bond multiple service raceways. Equipment bonding jumpers for service raceways are sized in accordance with Table 250.66, based on the largest ungrounded conductor within the raceway or cable. Where service conductors are paralleled in two or more raceways or cables, the bonding jumper for each raceway or cable must be sized in accordance with Table 250.66, based on the largest ungrounded conductors within the raceway or cable.

Example: What size equipment bonding jumper is required for each metal raceway containing 700 kcmil service conductors?

Answer: (c) 2/0 AWG [Table 250.66]

 

Q4. If I have 25 current carrying conductors in a wireway, do I have to derate them?

A4. No, only when more than 30 current-carrying conductors are installed in any cross-sectional area of the wireway, does the conductor ampacity, as listed in Table 310.16, need to be adjusted in accordance with Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) [376.22(B)]. Please note that signaling and motor control conductors between a motor and its starter used only for starting duty aren’t considered current carrying for conductor ampacity adjustment.

 

Q5. We recently sized a circuit to a commercial oven.  The manufacturer says the total load per phase is 58 amps single phase 240V and it’s not capable of being used continuously. What size conductor and protection can I use?

A5. The overcurrent rule is as follows: For nonmotor operated appliances, the appliance overcurrent device must not exceed 150 percent of the appliance rated current if the overcurrent device rating isn’t marked, and the appliance is rated over 13.30A. Where 150 percent of the appliance rating doesn’t correspond to a standard overcurrent device ampere rating listed in 240.6(A), the next higher standard rating is permitted.

 

Protection Size: 58A x 150% = 87A, 90A next size up [240.6(A)].

 

Conductors are sized no less than 125 percent of the continuous loads, plus 100 percent of the noncontinuous loads, based on the terminal temperature rating ampacities as listed in Table 310.16, before any ampacity adjustment [110.14(C) and 210.19(A)(1)].

 

Conductor size: 4AWG, rated 85A at 75°C [Table 310.16].

 

Q6. In an industrial building, the old panels do not have complete panel schedules. Does the code require us to update them?

A6. The circuits should have been identified when they were installed, in addition circuits that are modified must be legibly identified as to their clear, evident, and specific purpose [408.3].

 

Identification must include sufficient detail to allow each circuit to be distinguished from all others, and the identification must be on a circuit directory located on the face or inside of the door of the panelboard.

 

Q7. We have a 400A three phase feeder that we want to wire with parallel 3/0 AWG conductors. Can we install them in the same raceway?

A7. Each current-carrying conductor of a paralleled set of conductors must be counted as a current-carrying conductor for the purpose of conductor ampacity adjustment, in accordance with Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) [310.4(D)].

 

Example if neutral is considered a current carrying conductor: What is the adjusted ampacity of 3/0 THHN/THWN-2 conductors if the raceway contains a total of eight current-carrying conductors? Figure 310–17

Ampacity 3/0 THHN is 225A [Table 310.16 at 90C)

Adjustment Factor [Table 310.15(B)(2)(a)] = 0.70

Adjusted Ampacity = 225A x 0.70

Adjusted Ampacity = 158A

For this scenario you could not use 3/0 THHN in parallel in the same raceway because the combine ampacity is only 316A (158A x 2), which is not permitted to be protected by a 400A overcurrent device [240.4].

 

Example if neutral is NOT considered a current carrying conductor: What is the adjusted ampacity of 3/0 THHN/THWN-2 conductors if the raceway contains a total of eight current-carrying conductors? Figure 310–17

Ampacity 3/0 THHN is 225A [Table 310.16 at 90C)

Adjustment Factor [Table 310.15(B)(2)(a)] = 0.80

Adjusted Ampacity = 225A x 0.80

Adjusted Ampacity = 180A

For this scenario you could use 3/0 THHN in parallel in the same raceway because the combine ampacity is 360A (180A x 2), which is permitted to be protected by a 400A overcurrent device [240.4(B)].

 

   Note: When adjusting conductor ampacity, the ampacity used is based on the temperature insulation rating of the conductor as listed in Table 310.16, not the temperature rating of the terminal [110.14(C)].

 

Q8. Do the metal studs of a building need to be bonded or grounded to anything?

A8. No, however “exposed structural metal that forms a metal building frame that is likely to become energized” must be bonded to the service equipment enclosure, service neutral conductor, grounding electrode conductor of sufficient size, or grounding electrode system [250.104(C)].

 

Q9. I am hearing differing opinions about bonding steel gas piping. What are the rules for this?

A9. Metal piping systems such as gas or air that are likely to become energized must be bonded, but they can be bonded to the equipment grounding conductor for the circuit that may energize the piping [250.104(B)].

 

Q10. We have transformer with 8 parallel 500kcmil phase and neutral conductors on the secondary side. We connected the transformer XO to the case correctly, but we are having an argument about how to size the grounding conductors inside each of those raceways.

A10. An equipment bonding jumper must be run to the secondary system disconnecting means, and where the secondary equipment grounding conductor is of the wire type, it must be sized in accordance with Table 250.66, based on the area of the largest ungrounded secondary conductor in each raceway or cable [250.30(A)(2) and 250.102(C)].

 

Example: What size equipment bonding jumper is required for each flexible metal conduit containing 500 kcmil secondary conductors?

Answer: (d) 2 AWG [Table 250.66]

 

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

 
Comments
  • In reference to answer to question #4, clarification must be made that changes have been made to the wording of this rule over the past four code cycles to where it now simply requires derating where the number of conductors exceeds 30, and there is no mention of them being in any single cross section. It may not be what the intention of the changes were to be, but at any rate this is how the rule now reads. Think about it- if you had a wireway with ten conductors in one cross section, and twelve in another cross section, and twelve in another cross section, this would be over thirty conductors and require derating of all the conductors!

    Tom Studer
    Reply to this comment

  • I disagree with the answer to question #5. Branch circuit conductor sizing and overcurrent protection for appliances are two different rules- 422.10 for the branch circuit conductors and 422.11 for overcurrent protection. 422.10(A) requires the rating of a branch circuit to be not less than the marked rating of the appliance, in this case that rating is 58 amperes, therefore 6 AWG copper THWN/THHN copper conductors rated at 65 amperes are acceptable for this equipment, given the fact that is is not capable of continious use and the conductors simply need to be sized at 100% of the load. 422.11(E) does permit the overcurrent protection to be sized at up to 150% of the marked rating of the appliance, as long as it does not exceed any marked overcurrent protection on the appliance, but the rule does not require the overcurrent protection to be sized at 150%, therefore an overcurrent device having a rating of at least the appliance, up to 150% of the appliance rating may be used, in this case that would be a 60, 70, 80, or 90 ampere device.

    Tom Studer
    Reply to this comment

  • You recently had an item on bonding of gas piping. We normally call for bonding the piping on the grounding diagram. We often get the comment that the bonding to the appliance is all that is needed and that the metal piping is OK for this.

    Current trend is for use of CSST flexible connectors for the appliance connection. Is CSST listed or usable as a bonding means?

    Robert Cohen, PE
    Reply to this comment

  • question number one, about seling your home and haveing to upgrade, if an inspector comes in and sayes you should do this and this, you don't have to do anything. the people we bought our house from didn't even replace a light bulb that was out. there were code violations. and they didn't have to correct them. you change what is talked about with both parties.

    richard
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike....You are providing a vaulable service to us with this newsletter and I thank you for your dedication to helping us increase our understanding of the NEC.

    If we only has someone dedicated like yourself that could provide the same service in understanding the Federal Tax Code!

    Barry L. Calloway, P.E.
    Reply to this comment

  • Question #8, Art 250.102 (C) the service entrance conductors are paralleled in two or more raceways or cables, the equipment bonding jumper, where routed with the raceways or cables, shall be run in parallel. I would interprut this to mean that when the conduits enter the utility transformer supplying the service entrance and the service entrance panel that the bonding conductors should be run in parallel, one jumper per conduit. I have never observed this the field, it has always been one conductor connecting all of the conduits to the grounding terminal of the transformer.

    Art 250.102 (D) A single common continuous equipment bonding jumper shall be permitted to connect two or more raceways or cables...

    I would interprut this to allow the installation one bonding jumper from the ground bus to all of the conduits entering a piece of equipment, not a service entrance panel. I suspect that this article is being applied to service entrance equipment.

    Doug Decherd
    Reply to this comment

  • The answer to #10 should be 1/0 for a 500kcm copper conductor in the raceway. #2 is correct if the it is a 500kcm aluminum conductor.

    Lou Albonetti
    Reply to this comment

  • Pertaining to Question 9 is it allowable for electrical panels or sub panels to be bonded to a gas line.

    John Sullivan
    Reply to this comment

  • Re. A1 - The answer is only partially correct. The "law" that governs this situation are the local codes, rules, and regulations, as well as applicable State building codes. In addition, many communities have so-called point-of-sale requirements which may address this very issue. It is strongly recommended to verify with AHJ, and make sure this is truly legally required, and not just on an inspector's wish list.

    Sam KoolRe
    Reply to this comment

  • Re Q9. There is a common error in bonding piping that contain galvanic unions. These are used when transistioning from steel to copper water piping to prevent galvanic damage to the steel piping. These unions should NEVER be jumpered. The correct method would be to bond the piping on each side of the union as if they were separate pipes. There are cases where bonding a single side is sufficient but to allow for future modifications to the plumbing it would be better to bond both sides.

    Bob
    Reply to this comment

  • I'm confused about the Q/A 4 and the Q/A 7 answers. They seem to be in conflict with each other and the code as I read it. 25 conductors in a raceway do NOT need to be de-rated in Q/A 4, but 8 conductors in the same raceway do need de-rating. Obviously I am mis-reading the questions and answers! HELP!

    Thanks!

    dan baker
    Reply to this comment

  • Q8. Do the metal studs of a building need to be bonded or grounded to anything?

    A8. No, however “exposed structural metal that forms a metal building frame that is likely to become energized” must be bonded to the service equipment enclosure, service neutral conductor, grounding electrode conductor of sufficient size, or grounding electrode system [250.104(C)].

    THIS STATEMENT IS NOT TRUE FOR THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE....

    VINNY BURDO
    Reply to this comment

  • Can someone help out, I thought that you size the conductor based on the size of the overcurrent device. In question number 5 it looks like they sized it separate based on the 125% rule. Is this because the equipment is a non motorized appliance?

    T.Morgan
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike, Comment to answer of question 9. CSST or Gastite (corrugated Stainless Steel tubing) must be bonded according to Manufacturers recommendations. http://www.gastite.com/include/languages/english/downloads/pdfs/Nov2008_DI_Guide.pdf page 66 section 4.10 The bonding conductor shall be no smaller than a 6 AWG copper wire or equivalent. I agree with your answer if it is black iron. Maybe you can shed some light and let me know if I am reading this wrong or not.

    Todd
    Reply to this comment

  • Answer 5. doesn't make sense to me.Can somebody please explain.It say the overcurrent device (meaning breaker or fuse)can't be sized more that 150% of the appliance rated current if the overcurrent device rating isn't marked.Well if the overcurrent device isn't marked how many amps it can handle how are you going to size it no more than 150% of the appliance rated current???

    jim
    Reply to this comment

  • I am confused by your example to Q10 (NEC Questions Part 2). You listed a 2 AWG as the bonding jumper for flexible mettalic conduit containg 500 kcmil secondary conductors. You quoted Table 250.66, so I assume this is a service. If this were a service with parallel sets, according to 250.24(C)(2), the ungrounded conductor shall not be less than a 1/0 AWG, routed in each raceway. For a single set, the ungrounded conductor would be 2 AWG (Aluminum) or 1/0 AWG (Copper).

    Barry L. Calloway, P.E.
    Reply to this comment

  • Correction to my earler post at 11:34pm. For a single set, the ungrounded conductor would be 1/0 AWG for both copper and aluminum phase conductors. So where did the 2 AWG come from?

    Barry L. Calloway, P.E.
    Reply to this comment

  • in reference to Question #1: The Electrical system of the home is grandfathered to the standards it was constructed under. Your home was issued a certificate of occupyany 30 years ago and that C/O is still legal as long you leave the structure in it's original condition (No Additions or Conversions of unfinished space into living space, this includes conversion of the Garage into living space). Any addition or conversion has to be done to the standards in effect at the time of the conversion or addition. Of Course, You can update the electrical system if you want to make the home more appealing to a buyer but most sellers do not.

    Bill Fleming
    Reply to this comment

  • Q1: Under Q7 it was answered that 360 amps conductor is permitted to be protected by 400 amps ocp devise, which is higher than conductor amos. Pls clarify.

    gk

    gk
    Reply to this comment

  • regarding answer to question #3, 250.102(C) does not prohibit a single bonding jumper for tweleve rraceways in parallel. If, for example, the service raceways are steel conduit and stub into the bottom of an open bottom switchboard, a single bonding jumper may be installed to bond all of the raceways using bonding bushings on the conduit ends, and the single bonding jumper must be sized from Table 250.66, unless the total area of the conductors of any single phase exceeds 1100 kcmil copper or 1750 kcmil aluminum, and in this case the bonding jumper must be no less than 12.5% of the total area of the largest phase. The equipment bonding jumper only needs to be ran in parallel where that bonding jumper is routed with the raceways or cables, and in that case the bonding jumper would be sized based on the size of the conductors in each raceway. In addition there is nothing in this rule that would prohibit the instalation of individual bonding jumpers to each of the twelve raceways stubbing into the switchboard, and these would be sized according to the conductors contained in the individual raceway, which would probably be the most feasible method.

    Tom Studer
    Reply to this comment

  • I don't understand what NEC article [376.22(B)] is for. (Question 4) I always use Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) when I have muntiple current carring conductors in a raceway. I would have said the cables would have to be derated by 45%. Please help me understand what [376.22(B)] is for.

    Thank you

    Greg Lohmueller
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter