This article was posted 11/30/-0001 and is most likely outdated.

Conductor Size Matters
 

 

Topic - NEC
Subject - Conductor Size Matters

June 23, 2008
This newsletter was sent to 28712 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

Conductor Size Matters

 

By Mike Holt for EC&M Magazine

 

When sizing conductors, don’t get burned by ampacity adjustments.

 

The NEC provides minimum size requirements for conductors to prevent overheating and fire. Insulation type, ambient temperature, and conductor bundling are three primary factors in determining how big a conductor has to be for it to safely carry the current imposed on it.

 

A key concept in conductor sizing is understanding the definition of ampacity. The ampacity of a conductor is the amount of current the conductor can carry continuously under specific conditions of use [Article 100 definition]. The ampacity of a conductor is not what size breaker can be used to protect the wire; it is simply the amount of current the conductor can carry. It is important to recognize this subtlety.

 

Temperature correction

 

Table 310.16 lists ampacities under two conditions: 1- no more than three current-carrying conductors bundled together, and 2- an ambient temperature of 86ºF (30ºC). If either of these two values change, the ampacity of the conductor must change as well. If you look at the bottom of Table 310.16, you’ll see temperature correction factors in 5ºC increments from 21ºC through 80ºC.

 

When sizing conductors, you can’t use a temperature rating any higher than the lowest temperature rating of any connected termination or device [110.14(C)]. But you generally don’t find terminals rated above 75ºC, so why is there a 90ºC column for conductors? True, most terminations simply aren’t rated to carry 90ºC, but remember that when you adjust the ampacity of a conductor due to ambient temperature or conductor bundling, you use the 90ºC column to begin the calculation (assuming you are using a conductor 90ºC insulation rating). Read through example D3(a) in Annex D, and you will understand exactly why this column exists.

 

Use the conductor ampacity as listed in Table 310.16 and apply temperature adjustment factors based on the insulation rating of the conductor. Do not base conductor ampacity adjustment on the temperature terminal ratings discussed in 110.14(C). Also, understand that the location (wet, dry or damp) influences which column ampacity of Table 310.16 to use. You can find this information in Table 310.13(A). For example, notice that THHW is a 90°C conductor in a dry location, but it is a 75°C conductor in a wet location.

 

Let’s work an example to make sure we’ve got this straight. What is the minimum size THHN/THWN conductor you can use to supply a 40A noncontinuous load, in a dry location, if the conductors pass through an ambient temperature of 100ºF?

(a) 10 AWG     (b) 8 AWG       (c) 6 AWG       (d) any of these

 

Answer: (b) 8 AWG

 

Corrected Ampacity = Table 310.16 Ampacity x Ambient Temperature Correction Factor

 

For a dry location, use the 90°C column for THHN. For a wet location, use the 75°C column for THWN

 

Ambient Temperature Correction Factor for 100ºF = 0.91 for THHN

 

Table 310.16 ampacity for 10 THHN is 40A at 90ºC in a dry location

 

10 THHN = 40A x 0.91 = 36.40A

 

Table 310.16 ampacity for 8 THHN/THWN is 55A at 90ºC in a dry location: use the THHN column.

 

8 THHN = 55A x 0.91 = 50A

 

If this were in a wet location, would 8 THHN/THWN still be adequate?

 

Table 310.16 ampacity for 8 THHN/THWN is 50A at 75ºC in a wet location: use the THWN column.

 

Ambient Temperature Correction Factor for 100ºF = 0.88 for THWN

 

8 THWN  = 50A x 0.88 = 44A

 

The conductor must have an ampacity of at least 40A, after applying the ambient temperature correction factor, in order to carry the load. In this example, the 8 THHN/THWN has sufficient ampacity after correction in either a wet or dry location. That either/or result is not always the case, so pay attention to the wet/dry question when using conductors with dual-rated insulation types, and use the column that corresponds to the location. Also, keep in mind that conductor with a “-2” after its insulation, such as THHN/THWN-2, is rated 90ºC in a wet, dry or damp location.

 

What if you have conductors installed in raceways exposed to direct sunlight on or above rooftops? In such cases, add the ambient temperature adjustment in Table 310.15(B)(2)(c) to the outdoor ambient temperature when applying ampacity adjustment correction factors contained in Table 310.16.

 

Bundling

 

When conductors are bundled together, they lose some of their ability to dissipate heat. In the NEC, the allowable ampacity starts dropping whenever four or more current-carrying conductors are bundled together for more than 24 in. [310.15(B)(2)(a)]. Be aware that there are five exceptions described in 310.15(B)(2)(a). One of these exceptions is for AC or MC Cable, which allows up to 20 current-carrying conductors in 12 AWG, 2 or 3 conductor cables without having to adjust the ampacity.

 

If the ambient temperature is anything but 86ºF and more than three current-carrying conductors are bundled together, adjust the ampacity (listed in Table 310.16) for both conditions.

To make that adjustment, multiply these three numbers together:

  • Table 310.16 Ampacity
  • Temperature Correction Factor
  • Bundling Adjustment Factor

Always remember that the higher insulation temperature rating of 90ºC rated conductors provides a greater conductor ampacity for use in ampacity adjustment, even though you size those conductors based on the column that corresponds to the temperature listing of the terminals [110.14 (C)(1)]. When correcting or adjusting conductor ampacity, use the temperature insulation rating of the conductor as listed in Table 310.16, not the temperature rating of the terminal [110.14(C)].

 

If a single length of conductor has two ampacities, use the lower ampacity for the entire circuit [310.15((A)(2))]. An exception applies: if that portion of the conductor with reduced ampacity is not longer than 10 ft and is not longer than 10 percent of the length of the part of the circuit with the higher ampacity, you can use the higher ampacity for the entire circuit [310.15(A(2)) Ex].

 

Current-Carrying Conductors

 

Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) adjustment factors apply only when there are more than three current-carrying conductors bundled together. All phase conductors are considered current carrying, but what about other conductors? Here’s the rundown:

 

Grounding and Bonding Conductors, 310.15(B)(5). Grounding and bonding conductors are never considered current carrying [310.15(B)(5)].

 

Don’t count grounding and bonding conductors when adjusting conductor ampacity for the effects of conductor bundling [310.15(B)(5)]. They do, however, occupy space in the raceway and are included in raceway fill calculations (see Chapter 9, Table 1, Note 3), so you are accounting for their presence. You just aren’t counting them as current-carrying conductors.

 

Neutral Conductor—Unbalanced Loads, 310.15(B)(4)(a). A neutral conductor that carries only the unbalanced current from other conductors of the same circuit is not considered a current-carrying conductor.

 

Neutral Conductor—Unbalanced 3-Wire Wye Circuit, 310.15(B)(4)(b). The neutral conductor of a 3-wire circuit of a 4-wire, three-phase, wye-connected system carries about the same current as the line-to-neutral load currents of the other conductors. Due to this, it is considered a current-carrying conductor.

 

This can be proven by the following formula for 4-wire, three-phase, wye-connected systems: INeutral = √ (ILine12 + ILine22 + ILine32) - (ILine1 x ILine2 x ILine3)

 

Neutral Conductor—Nonlinear Loads, 310.15(B)(4)(c). The neutral conductor for a 4-wire, 3-phase wye circuit is considered a current-carrying conductor where more than fifty percent of the load consists of nonlinear loads.

 

Two-Wire Circuits. The neutral and ungrounded conductors of a 2-wire circuit are considered current carrying.

 

Nonlinear loads supplied by a 4-wire, three-phase, 120/208V or 277/480V wye-connected system can produce unwanted and potentially hazardous harmonic currents. Odd trplen harmonic currents (3rd, 9th, 15th, etc.) can add on the neutral conductor. To prevent fire or equipment damage from excessive harmonic neutral current, consider increasing the size of the neutral conductor, or installing a separate neutral for each phase. See 210.4(a) FPN, 220.61(C) FPN No. 2, and 450.3 FPN No. 2.

 

Meeting minimums

 

From an NEC standpoint, conductors must be of a certain size to prevent a fire [90.1(B)]. This is the minimum conductor size. It isn’t necessarily the recommended conductor size. From an operational efficiency standpoint, you should size conductors to reduce voltage drop and/or to cope with nonlinear loads. Other reasons for exceeding NEC minimums may also apply.

 

If your installation doesn’t even meet the NEC requirements, it will fail to meet other requirements that may also exist (such as those for operational efficiency). To prevent that, remember that the ampacity of a conductor changes with changing conditions. Part of your job in sizing conductors is to anticipate what those conditions will be.

 

To determine the correct ampacity, you have to determine:

  • Allowable ampacity, as listed in Table 310.16.
  • Ambient temperature correction factors, if the ambient temperature is not 86ºF.
  • Conductor ampacity adjustment factors, if four or more current-carrying conductors are bundled together.

The last two items are where things can get dicey if you don’t do your homework. Find out what the ambient temperature will be along the entire length of each conductor. Such things as cable routing (see the example in Appendix D3(a)) and ventilation can change ambient temperature considerably, so, take the time to review the entire installation—not just the electrical drawings.

 

If you correctly anticipate the ambient temperatures and perform the necessary ampacity adjustments, you’ll meet the NEC minimums for conductor sizing. From there, you can decide whether to allow for other considerations in making a final determination of conductor size.

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

 
Comments
  • If there are more than 41 current carrying conductors in a nipple longer than 24" Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) has an adjustment of 35%. For Load Diversity I am directed to Annex B which has a correction factor of 50%. What defines "No Diversity" and "Load Diversity"?

    Chad Bittick
    Reply to this comment
  • Reply from: Mike Holt   
    Annex B is not a Code rule, and I really don't know...
    Reply to Mike Holt


  • Thanks! Very informative.

    NicolBolas
    Reply to this comment

  • NEC Ratings are to prevent damage to conductor insulation. Exceeding the limits imposed by NEC may cause damage to the individual conductors carrying current.

    Steven Ray Webb
    Reply to this comment

  • Two questions, Would the conductors utilized and intended only for control (example: two conductors connected to a thermal cut-out circuit in a motor) be considered current carrying conductors, when contained in a multi-conductor flexible cord with the single or three phase power and ground conductors? And what effect would this have on the ampacity rating for a multi-conductor portable cord when these control conductors are of a smaller wire gauge than the power and ground conductors?

    Thank you Mike, for the only place to get answers to questions like this.

    Mark Prairie
    Reply to this comment

  • What I have found in the industrial setting is that using larger conductors than what NEC requires is more economical for industrial machines that draw continuous load which is the frequent case. After you add in the cost of down time as well as how much electricity is wasted in heating up wires plus the insanity of fixing something too frequently, what you want is something that just sits there and cranks out money.

    Remeber, NEC makes an ass-umption that a given level of life and efficiency is acceptable.

    Michael R. Cole
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter