This article was posted 08/07/2006 and is most likely outdated.

The Other Electrical Hazard: Electrical Arc Blast Burns
 

 
Topic - Safety
Subject - The Other Electrical Hazard: Electrical Arc Blast Burns

August 7, 2006  

| Ask a Question |  Code Graphic Code Quiz - All New! |  Free Stuff Instructors | Feedback
Online Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
[ image1 Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

The Other Electrical Hazard: Electrical Arc Blast Burns

 

imageElectric arc burns make up a substantial portion of the injuries from electrical malfunctions. The extremely high temperatures of these arcs, about four times as high as that of the sun’s surface, can cause fatal burns at up to about five feet (152 cm.), and major burns at up to about ten feet (305 cm) distance.

 

Almost everyone is aware that electrical shock can be a hazard to life, although the minor shocks that many have experienced with no dire consequences tend to make one somewhat careless of this. There is another hazard which few appreciate, which we do not even need to touch to incur injury. This is the radiation burn from the fierce fire of electric arcs, due to short circuit developing from poor electrical contact or failure of insulation. The electric arc between metals is, next to the laser, the hottest thing on earth, or about four times as hot as the sun’s surface. Where high arc currents are involved, burns from such arcs can be fatal where the victim is even several feet from the arc, and debilitating burns at distances of ten feet are common. Clothing is ignited at distances of several feet; this itself can cause fatal burns, because the clothing cannot be removed or extinguished quickly enough to prevent serious burns over much of the body skin area.

 

Click here or on the image above to read the entire Electrical Arc Blast Burns article produced by AVO Training Institute, Inc. The AVO Technical Resource Center provides electrical reference books, industry standards, training materials, personal protective equipment, insulated hand tools, and safety tools.

 

 

[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

To suggest a topic or submit content for a newsletter: nlsuggest@mikeholt.com
Experiencing a Problem? Contact our Webmaster

Comments
  • I've received Articles I, II & IV. Where can I get Article III?

    James Wilson, PE
    Reply to this comment

  • Hello mr. Holt, I've been told differently about the temperature of an "electrical arc". I was told by an instructor from "NTT" , and also a phycisist from "stanford university" , that the temperature of an "electric arc" is 9 times hotter than the surface of the sun, and it's the 3rd hottest flame known to man. The only other flames that excede the "electric arc" are "neuclear fision" and "the lazer". I'm sorry to say i'm not sure of the order of these.

    mike peterson
    Reply to this comment

  • Is it very erronious (and dangerous to imply) in the first sentence to state that fatal burns can occur at distances only up to 5 feet, when calories can easily excede 100 at over 10 feet.

    Bob McGregor
    Reply to this comment

  • I found your article very interesting. The most concerning part was the statement in Table IV, the maximum transformer rating for non-fatal skin burns for 0.48 kv. is 1.9 MVA. With more and more installations with capacity in excess of 2 MVA, how do you suggest mitigating the hazard?

    Some engineers are designing installations with smaller transformers; say 2 at 1000 KVA each which will add redundancy as well.

    Some engineers are utilizing High Resistance Grounding systems. This will reduce the potential of an arc hazard by limiting the ground fault current to a low value. This will only offer protection on single phase to ground faults, not phase to phase, or three phase faults. The potential of having a single phase to ground fault are between 80% and 98% of all faults depending on which literature you read. The added benefit is using an isolation transformer to service lighting loads. The energy available at the ballast is reduced to a much lower level.

    Suitable protective clothing must always be worn.

    I am sure there are many more means to minimize the risk of an arc blast burn.

    Sergio Panetta
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter