Visit MikeHolt.com
When A Company Almost Has An Incident - Is NFPA 70E the Law?   

 

SPECIAL REPORT: When A Company Almost Has An Incident

Is NFPA 70E the Law?

By Brandi Fuller, Chief Editor for The Current Monitor Image

After making safety advancements to the electrical system, the maintenance crew at Pittsburgh Corning in Sedalia, Missouri began powering upthe plant after a company-wide shutdown. While doing so, they were surprised to see power restored to both the line and load side of a disconnect even though the panel was locked and tagged out.

"Seeing the LEDs [of the voltage indicators] flashing on both sides of the disconnect...caused immediate concern," says MJ Anderson, a maintenance repairman with Pittsburgh Corning. The team took the necessary precautions and began investigating why power was restored.

After confirming the voltage indicators were wired correctly, they opened the cabinet door and discovered the handle to the disconnect had broken away from the knives, which had been welded in place over time.

"...all we could think about, really, was if somebody had turned that on, it might have been ugly," shutters Terry Logan, a maintenance repairman with Pittsburgh Corning.

CLICK HERE to watch the Pittsburgh Corning team recount this incident in the Current Monitor Special Report.

Click Here to Post a Comment
Click Here to View Comments

 
Visit: Exam Preparation | Continuing Education | Code Products | Newsletters | and more
 

If you wish to unsubscribe from this newsletter Click Here

 
Copyright© Mike Holt Enterprises All Rights Reserved This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be displayed or published on the Internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.
"... as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord" [Joshua 24:15]
 
Comments
  • Looking at the video it would be easy for the workers to not notice the position of the blades because of the disconnect arc shield. Many industrial plants and government facilities use building engineers to do medium and low voltage switching for routine maintenance procedures, and they don't deal with electrical issues on a routine basis. Their only inclination that something was wrong would have been in the feel of the disconnect handle during it's opening operation. An electric may have not noticed this either. They were lucky that the whole plant was down and the energized feeder was not being worked on.

    CM  December 6 2014, 1:43 pm EST
    Reply to this comment

  • First, I thank God that no one was hurt. Second, I pray that this incident leads to refresher training.

    Tim M.  December 2 2014, 3:11 pm EST
    Reply to this comment

  • NFPA 70E is only the law when adopted into law by a government jurisdiction. Otherwise it is a standard for implimenting OSHA. OSHA is the law.

    Mike Vert  December 1 2014, 5:27 pm EST
    Reply to this comment

  • I have to commend the company on their safety program and everything that has been accomplished. Having spent many years in the industrial environment, I have to disagree with this report and some actions that were not taken. On the First Note; my question is "Why wasn't the disconnect checked when the power was off for the blades to checked?" It is a standard with most electricians to ALWAYS check the load side when the disconnect handle is OPENED. With the type of disconnect that was shown and most that I have seen over the years, Most of the blades are visible. On the Second Note; The handle was BROKEN when the power was energized and the load side was energized pretty much instantaneously. If the handle was put into the closed position, No Damage would have occurred. They would have noticed there was "No Resistance" in the operation and that would have indicated a problem. The problem would have occurred Down Stream if someone was working on the load side when the power was energized. My conclusion to this video and report shows me that the maintenance personnel, were improperly trained to begin with and SHOULD NOT have been working on this equipment unless they are "Trained & Qualified Electricians" In my honest opinion, this was abn opportunity for the "Media" to capitalize & sensationalize a topic they know nothing about. Maybe the personnel will get better training after that incident.

    Walter Croteau  November 30 2014, 9:23 am EST
    Reply to this comment

  • While over my 30 years of startup and commissioning along with re-energizing and backfeeds, your suppose to visually perform an inspection and test all items for any type of power before and after the system is worked on. Then prior to energizing, you are suppose to verify again visually that all items are open prior to loading the gear. Basic 101 stuff.

    Jim  November 29 2014, 10:27 am EST
    Reply to this comment
  • Reply from: Doug   November 29 2014, 11:23 am EST
    It happen to me before indicators were offered thru heart into afibe
    Reply to Doug

    Reply from: Walter Croteau   November 30 2014, 9:25 am EST
    I completely agree with you Jim.
    Reply to Walter Croteau


  • Having worked inside high voltage cabinets all my career it is sobering to realize how such a simple thing as a broken disconnect could potentially kill you. Bravo to Pittsburgh Corning for making sure that you workers leave the job in the same condition they got there!

    kg1321  November 29 2014, 5:34 am EST
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter