This article was posted 10/14/2011 and is most likely outdated.

Mike Holt Newsletters
 

 

Topic - Electrical History
Subject - Grounded Conductor to be Identified

October 14, 2011
This newsletter was sent to 17995 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Continuing EducationQuizzes |  Free Stuff Instructors Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]  

Grounded Conductor to be Identified

 

By L.W. Brittian

Image

Reading the 6 Th. Edition of the National Electrical Code Handbook, based upon the 1947 NE code supplement, It talks about existing wiring and the grounding conductor not being identified. That the code is not retroactive. That with the new edition of the NE code they must to be identified as white or natural gray. So the color white has been required to be used for over 60 years to identify the grounded conductor!

Chapter 19 GROUNDING, identifies two types of grounding:


"A system ground is a connection to ground from one of the current carrying conductors of a distribution system or an interior wiring system "

"An equipment ground is a connection to ground from one or more of the non-current carrying metal parts of the wiring system or of apparatus connected to the system. As used in this sense, the term equipment includes all such metal parts such as metal conduit, metal raceway, armor of cables, outlet boxes, cabinets, switch boxes, motor frames and metal enclosures of motor controllers."

The general descriptions provided in this edition of the handbook for why systems are ground follow the concepts specified in the NEC today.

The word "bonding" is not used even once in the entire chapter covering grounding.

The system diagrams provided in the Grounding chapter show metal conduit connected to the grounded service enclosure. No EGC is shown!

Yet another quote is:


" It is recommended that in locations where it is necessary to use burred or driven electrodes for grounding interior wiring systems, additional grounds such as connections to a system grounding conductor, be placed on the distribution circuit."

I understand this to be an early recommendation for what today we call an equipment grounding conductor (EGC).

Deeper in the grounding chapter, I found the following quote to be interesting:


" The resistance of a good ground to a water piping system will commonly be much less that 2 ohms, with corresponding reduction in the possible voltage to ground where heavy current flows through ground connections."

" A single rod or pipe driven 8 ft in the ground does not, as a general rule, provide as low a ground resistance as is desirable, particularly where the soil at times becomes very dry or where rock underlies a large area."

Perhaps this is why there is a modern code requirement that a ground with more than 25 ohms be supplemented.

The handbook shows two pictures of a "Groundmeter" what I call a three point fall of potential test instrument, a Weatstone bridge or a kelvin meter.

Another interesting quote follows:


" Continuous metallic underground water- or- gas-piping systems in general have a resistance to ground of less than 3 ohms. Metal frames of buildings and local metallic underground piping systems, water well casings, and the like, have, in general, resistance substantially below 25 ohms."

From this reference to 25 ohms, I infer a general agreement in industry at that time, that  a ground of over 25 ohms would prove to be ineffective. I have yet to discover the original source of and science supporting the 25 ohm value referenced in today's NE code.

The chapter covering Hazardous locations requires a bonding jumper be used and not lock nuts. So the current  NE code requirement to use a bonding jumper in hazardous (classified) locations has been around for over sixty years.

During this stage of development of electrical systems and equipment, three prong 110 volt plugs were known, however most convenience outlets and appliances were provided with only two prong plugs.

The author of this edition of the McGraw-Hill National Electrical code Handbooks is the Arthur L Abbot of New York, NY.

Gee I wish I could talk with Mr. Abbot, and Mr.Edison, Bell, Tesla, Westinghouse, Mr. Croft, Mr. Summers, Mr. Soares. . .

"History is the tutor of life"


L.W. Brittian
Mechanical and Electrical Instructor

 

Click here to post a comment

[ Post Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]
[ View More Newsletters ]

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

 

 
Comments
  • It's incredible, many of us learned the trade and assumed the old timers knew their business. Reading this article and the date it was written proves they sure did know their stuff. I'm privileged to have worked with a few masters. The grounding information was exactly the same information i learned in the 80s.

    ChrisP  November 11 2011, 12:10 pm EST
    Reply to this comment

  • I just happen to have the 1947 Code in Loose Leaf, Hard Back & Paper Back editions.

    Makes for very interesting reading.

    Larry Cox  October 24 2011, 9:06 am EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • would be nice to see, read, or even download a scanned copy.

    fred schwappach  October 19 2011, 9:03 pm EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • "Perhaps this is why there is a modern code requirement that a ground with more than 25 ohms be supplemented."

    Actually, that rule has been around for over 150 years. It is the standard that was set by the wire line telegraph designers for the standard single wire earth return system used on US systems.

    It just carried over into the non-telegraph electrical codes as an accepted, tried and true standard.

    Marky  October 15 2011, 12:11 pm EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • retraction, I meant grounded path, not grounding, Correction to the second sentence. Perry Vogler

    perry vogler  October 15 2011, 8:21 am EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • Yes you right, Things haven't changed much and we really had some smart people with great forsyth involved with the NEC. We did not have a three wire system back then because they thought the safest system was to keep you away from the grounding path, it's not because it was not known, it was a decision. I think more and more they found out that it was hard to keep you from a grounding path as many people were electrocuted, so they adopted the practice of now grounding or bonding all non current carrying metal parts. We still use this system today in appliances and hand tools. Kind of a toss up on safety. Perry Vogler

    perry vogler  October 15 2011, 8:18 am EDT
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter